I wasn’t going to chime in on this subject, yet. But what the heck.
My first rod was a Scott SAS 9’ for 5 wt. Got it just five years ago at Trouthunter in Island Park, ID. I fished it a fair amount and considered it a good rod, until I got a Powell 9’ for 5 wt that I liked a lot better.
Last January, I was fishing a small stream with the SAS 905. On a backcast, I caught a branch with the fly, and on the forward cast, the rod broke about 6" from the tip. I figured I had probably hit that spot with a beadhead nymph a time or two, and it just took the force of the forward cast against that snag to finish it off.
In early March, I took the rod up to Trouthunter, with the expectation that they would send it back to Scott for “repair,” as I interpretted the Scott warranty, or replacement, not likely. Trouthunter confirmed that for $25, Scott would either replace the tip section with a freshly built tip section made to match the butt section, which is in just dandy shape, or send along a new rod. They estimated it would take 4-6 weeks, which was fine with me.
At the end of five weeks, I called Trouthunter for status. After five days, they finally got back to me. Since that model was out of production, Scott was not going to interrupt their production to build the new tip section until they got a break. Would be another three weeks before I got the rod back.
Saw the Trouthunter rep at the East Idaho Expo several weeks later and mentioned it to him. It has been four weeks since the expo and I still haven’t heard anything.
I’ve just kind of been waiting to see how Trouthunter and Scott would take care of a customer named Scott who hunts trout with a Scott rod ( among others ). Then I was going to post the results just so folks would have an idea what they might run into buying a Scott product from Trouthunter.
Maybe this should have gone on the Sound Off Forum, but it did seem appropriate to post it here and now.
John