- You are here:
- FAOL Home >>
- Articles >>
- Staff Editorials
Sometimes the FAOL staff has something to share with our readers that doesn't quite fit in a normal category. These items can be found here. |
FROM THE ARCHIVES, The old Rod
The Old Rod |
Sounds like the title of a great story. Wish that it was so, but it is just about an old cane rod I bought a few days ago. I still am not quite sure why I bought it. Something just told me that, "Hey, you ought to have that rod. It's kind of like one you used to have years and years ago." So I contacted the fellow on our bulletin board and for a hundred bucks it's mine now. He only had it a few days having bought it from a traveling 'flea market' chap down in Texas. Where this rod has been before that is anyone's guess. But, I have it now. And I like it. Rods were cheap then, during the late forties and early fifties. A few bucks and you were in business. Oh sure, there were high priced cane rods, but the average guy could not begin to afford one. Nope, these production bamboo rods were the 'work-horses' of the sport. They were not the 'state-of-the-art,' far from it, but they were the rods which made fly fishing what it is today. It was the mass production of cheap but very serviceable cane rods which allowed the average Joe like me to be on the stream or lake with a reasonable chance of catching something on a fly. The rod would often raise a blister or two. The action was mostly slow and somewhat wobbly but they would cast or lob a fly out there and that is all that counted. Not many realized they were rather poor casting tools. They were what they were. Bamboo fly rods. What's the big deal? With nothing to compare them to and a low cost there was no thought as to how well they performed for most of us. They cast and that was that. They performed; what more was there to ask? Sometimes they got broken, usually a few inches off of the tip. Many are the rods which had some 'issue' about three or four inches down from the tip. No problem. Heat up the tip, slide it off and jam it down on the shortened tip section. There was usually enough glue left in the tip to hold it just fine. You might need to whittle the tip just a tad but maybe not. Probably improved the casting anyhow. And it was not a big deal or a thing of shame to have one with that 'modification' either. At least if it was, I sure didn't know of it and didn't know anyone who did either. Not so today, but that is how it is with capitalism and the law of supply and demand. Throw in a few international conflicts and you are in today's society. Now our gear is almost bullet-proof, in fact the guarantees are. Not so in the past. "You buy it; you bought it." Many rods for a few bucks more came with two tips; they (and you) knew you were going to bust at least one of them. The main argument of the day was should you rotate the use of the two tips or not. I don't think that one was ever solved by the way. The cane was cheap and the rods worked. Fly fishing was available to the average man and he took to it with a passion. One of the main companies was Montague Rod & Reel of MA. They made several models and anyone who owned one would refer to them as, "Oh, it's a Montague Sunbeam" or such. |