Increasing temperatures worldwide have caused an increase in the amount of average snowmelt/glacial melting that is temporarily decreasing the temperature of your local waters.
Also, global warming CLEARLY only affects the oceans, the air, and land. Therefore, following the first (I think) law of thermodynamics, “all actions have an equal and opposite reaction”, small bodies of water get colder as temperatures elsewhere increase.
Ummm… Spinner1, how many glaciers are there in your part of Wisconsin?
Does anyone know what part of the oven I put the ice cube tray in to freeze while the roast is on?
I actually don’t want to be rude to the previous poster. I want to put a context on the ideas. Being an inveterate smart @$$, I can’t see another to make the same point. Once again, I apologize to the previous poster for what is sure to be insult taken if not intended. It is only the idea which I wish to offend against.
Spinner1,
I don’t think the temp difference from last year to this year means anything one way or another. Now I would be interested what your Journal said for the past 5 years.
Doug
Obvioulsy Google won’t let this thread be found.
YOu will have a visit from the “global warming” police soon for sure. YOu can’t post information on the internet that goes contrary to the idealism of the far left. YOu should have known better.
No offense taken. The facetiousness was meant to imply that I was not in any way serious in my response. I did not mean that there were glaciers in Wisconsin my point was simply that Al Gore is not the be-all and end-all that people take him, and his film, to be.
I could have hoped that an “inveterate smart @$$” would have seen this, but apparently my smart-alleck part of my brain was tired that day or simply on vacation.
Oh but a miniscule ‘rise’ in global temperatures is the fault of one thing. Funny how we can see the effect of temperature on a body of water can possibly be the work of many things but if a few tell us the globe is warming we:
I like your hypothesis. Back in the 70’s I was studying stream improvement/reclamation strategies (we don’t have cold-water species in KS but I was still interested). One of the best places for finding working strategies seemed to be WI. I remember that with good improvements, average stream temps fell. I would think that similar “improvements” in the watershed could lead to the same result assuming that changes in the watershed might lead to increases in ground water sources for the stream. Perhaps your “spring” creeks are becoming more “springy”