When I click on [url=http://www.ewinghackle.com:983db]http://www.ewinghackle.com[/url:983db] the link is forwarded to [url=http://www.made-in-china.com/prod/catlist/:983db]http://www.made-in-china.com/prod/catlist/[/url:983db]
It must be some mistake. It seems as if you can’t buy anything in this country that isn’t made in or controlled by China. Isn’t that ironic… They are one of the most serious threats and adversaries to our country (USA). Almost everything in stores throughout this country is “Made in China”. That is frightening. Look when you shop. It gets worse as time goes on.
Anyone know the true link to Ewing?
Ewing Hackle is in IA. Do a search on google or other search engine.
Donald
Hi Ed,
Sounds like someone hacked their website.
Happy Trails!
Ronn
Hint - ewinghackle.com is not their web address. 
D.
Ewings web site is at [url=http://www.ewingfeatherbirds.com/:3998b]http://www.ewingfeatherbirds.com/[/url:3998b]
Unfortunately the site looks to be in disrepair and I couldn’t get much good information there. Mike Hogue used to be a good dealer who has a web fly shop at eflytyer.com. Ewing has the best darn wolly bugger hackle I have ever had the pleasure to tie with. The dry fly hackle is pretty reasonable and looks good but I have never worked with it. Good luck! BTW thanks to the webmaster for getting me set up so I can finally post.
Thanks for the info. I got them. Apparently the URL I had was incorrect. Ed.
So is Ewing hackle raised in China?? There are alot of domestic producers aren’t there? Let’s buy from them. I believe one of the main reason bird-flu begans is the totally unsanitary conditions that fowl are kept overseas, Fowl raised for hackle in US is in much better conditions…the China trade thing is a total joke, but what would we expect with the idiots we have running the country, remember they are the ones who started to count hatchery salmon as ones returning to spawn…I can’t buy a Cuban cigar but can buy everthing made in China…what a total joke.
Ewing feather birds are raised in IOWA, not China. IOWA is part of the USA.
The EPA counting of hatchery fish was not done by the current adminstration, it was the other idiots prior. Get your facts right please.
[This message has been edited by LadyFisher (edited 11 March 2006).]
OK, raised in Iowa, that is the question I needed answering. The Salmon counts:It was not the other idiots…it was these idiots and if you can’t find 500 examples to prove they are…you do not possess an open mind.Go to seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/171391_salmon30.html, no mention of previous idiots, in fact it says they counted them the way they should be.Don’t let a closed mind obscure the MY FACTS STRAIGHT.
[This message has been edited by imaxfli (edited 11 March 2006).]
[This message has been edited by imaxfli (edited 11 March 2006).]
Sorry, the PI is the very last place I would ever go to get correct information.
LadyFisher, Publisher of
FAOL
Well that was only one source. google it once 50 other sources say THIS idiot administration, not the previous idiot administration…any fly-fisher who supports the current idiots must fish on private waters.
Sorry, wrong again. We live on Hood Canal, WA that is saltwater, you know the stuff where the salmon live. We have been involved with the plight of the Pacific salmon here for many years. We probably know more about it than you. And no, I don’t even know of any private water holding salmon. So you just aren’t winning this one.
LadyFisher, Publisher of
FAOL
Well, that still doesn’t change that fact that it was the current idiot administration that did it…the previous idiot one actually did some things to help the salmon(stopped logging in Tongrass etc)…you believe in Intelligent Design don’t you?? I WON it because I named the correct Idiot administration that started to count hatchery salmon, you did not, you were wrong, it was never even proposed before 2000.
[This message has been edited by imaxfli (edited 11 March 2006).]
What exactly does all this have to do with Ewing hackle?
I agree with Jayatwork. All Ed Gallop
wanted to know in the very first post was the the true link to Ewing.
While bashing the current administration is de rigeur in some circles, not all ills can be laid at its door.
This is one of them. imaxfli-- your first post says it all about the level of knowledge you bring to this: your assumption that the current administration “counts hatchery salmon as ones returning to spawn” is not even close to the controversy concerning hatchery and wild fish.
Not only that, but the business concerning hatchery fish being included with wild fish in determining ESA status started back in the mid '90’s, not as you assert, when NMFS used hatchery stock in determining run populations of Oregon’s coastal coho stocks for ESA purposes.
This all came to a head when a judge in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said that if hatchery stock were used to determine run status originally, then they had to be considered when the status was revisited. In other words, if you count apples and oranges in determining how full the fruit basket is the first time, then you can’t just count apples the second time.
Unfortunately, some folks decided that the court and the administration were somehow in collusion…and from there you have the current controversy concerning wild fish and hatchery fish.
Judging from your last post in this thread, you need to rein in your responses. This is a private house into which you’ve entered. Getting snotty with the owners (especially with the lack of knowledge you’ve shown) is a good way to be invited to leave.
Keith
Mr.Jackson, I have always respected you. Thanks for the post.
I know you know what you’re talking about.
[This message has been edited by ducksterman (edited 11 March 2006).]
I enjoyed this bit of civil discourse, other than the uncivil part. Never call names in a debate. That said, I don’t feel like one should be admonished for an opposing view and threatened by non-moderators with expulsion from a board. Enough good folks get kicked off here as it is.
The problem is the ‘opposing view’ claimed ‘facts’ which were not facts. We have no problem with folks expressing ‘views’ - but a lot of people read this website every day, and to allow disinformation to stand is just wrong.
LadyFisher, Publisher of
FAOL
Come on lady…admit it…you believe in intelligent design,…then why didn’t your hero President get any???