First of all let me update everyone about what
has happened since my first email and article
went out:
September 16th, 2004
I met with Ken Morrow in Branson to discuss
submitting the White River System (WRS) to
various organizations. Ken Morrow and I have
submitted the entire WRS for the American Rivers
Organization Top Ten Most Endangered Rivers List
for 2005. Endangered meaning the rivers are
changing drastically. The application packet
required a contact person be named and three
essays about various subjects concerning the
WRS and be submitted by the cutoff date of
October, 1, 2004. The announcement of the 2005
Most Endangered Rivers List will be posted in April.
If we make this list, we will become eligible for
grants and awards to study and attack the problems
of the WRS. Ken Morrow will be the contact person
for the American Rivers Organizations. The packet
was submitted before the cutoff date so keep your
fingers crossed. Surprisingly, the American Rivers
Organization has already been accumulating data and
has assigned staff to monitor the WRS. All they
were waiting for was someone to stand up and say
that we want to stop the polluting of our rivers.
I got the opinion that the packet of materials was
merely a formality because of their concern and
willingness to accelerate the whole submitting process.
September 19th-25th, 2004
This was a bad week for Norfork Lake and the
North Fork River. The first of this week the
Striper Bass started coming through the dam
discharge. Stripers are one of the few fishes
that can tolerate the dramatic change in pressure
from the lake to the river and live. Some came
through alive and a few dead. Fishermen in the
river were catching them. I figured something
was up, and in about two days the Striper started
dying in the lake near the dam. On Darrel "Bink" Binkly
radio program on KTLO, The Arkansas Game & Fish (AG&F)
said that only a couple dozen Stripers had died
and they stocked more than what was dying. The AG&F
also stated that this occurrence "was not that unusual."
The AG&F said that the die-off was attributed to the
large amount of "organic matter" that was in the lake
due to the high water Spring trying to decompose and
absorbing the oxygen from the water.
Now, this is what I observed on Saturday, September 25.
From the Quarry Cove Marina to the dam I counted 77
dead Striper Bass. Of these Stripers, only two were
less than 30 inches long. The rest were from 30 - 48
inches. I did not count the dead Stripers on the other
side of the lake near the dam, and reports of still
others dying the week of the Conclave were common.
Not all of the dead fish came to the top; this is
evident because they were coming through the dam
discharge dead. No telling how many are littering
the bottom of the lake. These die-offs are not common
occurrences. They are only common in the last ten
years or so. Now they happen every year whether the
Spring runoff is high or low. The problems with the
water in the lake are the same problems being experienced
in the rivers. "Organic Matter," low oxygen levels,
phosphates, sulfates, and nitrates are causing all
of these problems. I will post a picture of the some
of the Stripers at the end of this article.
September 26th - October 2nd, Conclave Week
Several fly fishermen came at the beginning of
the week to fish before the Conclave. Those that
I spoke to said that there were "rafts" of dead
algae coming through Bull Shoals Dam on the River
Cliff Golf Course side of the river. Rafts of algae
2 foot by 4 foot were the norm and fishing was
"cast and clean." Several FFF members commented
on the conditions of the river and the dramatic
changes that had taken place in just one year.
My answer was that next year doesn't look any
brighter.
The Conservation Forum held on Saturday by Verne
Lehmberg, the National Conservation Director of
the FFF had only ten people in attendance,
including Mr. Lehmberg and Vaughan Coomer, who
is not a FFF member. Only one Arkansas club was
represented and that person left before the
discussion on the White River System began. I
don't think a Missouri club was represented at
all, but I may be mistaken. Mr. Lehmberg has a
PHD in Biology. He did his thesis work on
"Phosphates in Water." He was well aware of
the problems in the WRS and gave Vaughan and
myself some recommendations and directions to
follow.
October 3rd-7th
I had a meeting with Dennis and Amy Galyardt about
becoming a "Waterkeeper" and joining the Waterkeeper
Alliance, https://www.waterkeeper.org/ . I think
this is an organization that is fighting the same
types of problems that we are experiencing in all
of the waters of Arkansas. This is surely the
organization we need to align ourselves with.
Please check out their website and educate
yourself on the entire alliance. I sent them
an email last night and have not received an
answer as of yet.
Non Point Source Pollution
I have heard this term, Non Point Source Pollution,
until I am fed up with it. I am going to explain
this term so it will be understood. Non Point
Source Pollution means that you can not pinpoint
a source of pollution because of the existing
standards that qualify a source as a polluter.
In other words the Waste Water Treatment Plants
in Arkansas are not considered "Point Source
Polluters" because their discharge falls within
the standards for waste water in Arkansas. If
the standards for waste water were raised, the
majority of Arkansas' Waste Water Treatment Plants
would become polluters; which, to my way of thinking,
they are. The states of Oklahoma and Missouri think
this way also. Oklahoma successfully prosecuted
Arkansas in 1992 and won. Arkansas signed an
agreement with Missouri in 1999 to pay for half
of the clean up. In my research, I have found
no evidence that they have raised their waste
water standard or contributed to cleaner water.
The problems with all of the rivers in Arkansas
are due to Arkansas and its water standards.
I am including a letter from my friend, David Vincent,
who is an Environmental Marine Biologist. I have
known David since he was 13 years old. His father,
Captain Jon Vincent, and I have been best of friends
for many years. David graduate with honors from the
University of Houston. He works for an "investigative
environmental company" in Houston. His father owns
a home at the end of River Cliff Golf Course in
Bull Shoals, and David visits him quite frequently.
Over a year ago, David tutored his father and me
on the problems of the WRS. The following excerpt
is from David's recent letter for me to read at the
Conclave Conservation Forum.
What has happened to Our Rivers!
I have been fishing both the White and North Fork
River for fifteen plus years and have watched these
rivers turn from wonderful fishing rivers to rivers
that are suffering a great ecological breakdown. I
frequently fish the areas from the Bull Shoals Dam
to Cane Island and the Norfork Dam to the ripples
downstream of the Handicapped Access. I have
watched for at least the last five years both
rivers deteriorate at an alarming rate. The fish
have gotten smaller and fewer, the water has gotten
cloudy and smells foul, the bottoms have turned
green and there are large beds of dead weeds on
the banks of both rivers. These problems are due
to the pollution entering the rivers above each
of the dams where it accumulates and is discharged
from the bottom of the lakes through the dams. The
Clean Water Act (CWA) by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) was drafted to help preserve and clean
up the waterways of the United States. This appears
not to be the case with both of these great and
famous Arkansas rivers.
Congress passed the CWA in 1972, which updates the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA). CWA
provides a framework of laws to deal with the
control of water pollution and water quality.
Many amendments have been passed since then and
are updated on a yearly basis. Many of these areas
deal with permitting, controlling standards, and
protecting of waterways and wetlands.
Many of the problems with these rivers start not
at the dams but many miles above them. Many non-point
sources are above the series of dams and pollute
the rivers that feed the river system with both
chemical and biological waste. Non-point sources
are sources that cannot be tracked down to one
particular place or source. A good example is
run off from farmland which livestock and
fertilizers for crops are washed into the rivers
and carried down stream. Fecal matters from
livestock add biological waste and chemical
waste to these rivers. Many of the feeds contain
proteins that the animals pass undigested into
the water to feed the algae and bacteria.
Fertilizers use phosphate and nitrogen as
the main ingredients to promote growth of
crops. What the crops do not absorb is washed
from the fields by rain showers and promotes
the growth of algae beds within the rivers.
Expanding town and cities above the dams stress
sewer and septic system to capacity before towns
are willing to spend sizable budgets to enlarge
and improve wastewater treatment plants (WWTP).
All these points help alga blooms within the
river system.
In a Federal court case of Arkansas vs. Oklahoma
(1992), the state of Oklahoma sued the City of
Fayetteville. Arkansas debated the fact that the
CWA did not protect the water quality the standards
enacted by Oklahoma. The court ruled that the State
of Arkansas may not degrade the water quality to
below the standards of Oklahoma.
The dams have become anaerobic lagoons at the
bottom half of the water levels. There is very
little if any oxygenation and there is no light
penetrating down to the depths at the bottom of
the lakes. This allows the bottom to set-up as
an anaerobic or no oxygen environments. This
does not mean this area cannot support life.
Many bacteria live and thrive in these areas
if there is enough heat. They generally prefer
ninety degrees or warmer to live optimally.
The temperature of the water coming off the
bottom of the dam is around forty-eight to
fifty-two degrees. This results in the activity
of these bacteria beds being severely retarded.
In the federal case of American Meat Institute
vs. EPA (1985), anaerobic lagoons were investigated
and found that the optimum temperature for these
lagoons is 90 degrees and that during the winter
months the water temperature fell below this point.
This results in the ability of the bacteria beds
to digest protein waste to decline.
The bacteria (nitrobacteria) perform a nitrogen
cycle during the decomposition process. Waste
is converted to NH3 (ammonia) to NO2 to NO3
and eventually to harmless nitrogen (N), which
is then off gassed through the water harmlessly
to the atmosphere. This process can also produce
hydrogen sulfide that is a highly toxic and
corrosive gas when the bacteria beds go anaerobic.
This gas is often associated with the smell of
rotten eggs. An easy way to see this is to take
a canister filter from an aquarium and to stop
all flow through it and stop as much light from
reaching it. Let it stand for one or two days
and open it to fresh air (open at arm length
and outside). The smell of hydrogen sulfide
will be over powering. One of the biggest dangers
to my reef tank is a power outage. When the power
turns back on, this hydrogen sulfide will be
circulated within the tank and will surely kill
most of the livestock within the tank with its
toxicity.
One the great evidences in the river of the
ecological problems and the ineffectiveness
of the decomposition process above the dams
are the huge amount of green gelatinous clumps
that are spat down the river through the dams.
This is partially digested and digested alga
from above the dams. This accelerates on the
shoals and banks of both the White and North
Fork Rivers and slowly finishes decomposing.
As this decomposition happens, this waste
slowly poisons the river. The amounts I saw
last year were mind boggling. I spent considerable
time pulling pieces of it from my fishing line.
The ooze that settles on the bank smells like
rotten fish from ammonia being release as the
sun dries it out. There is also a rotten egg
smell to water adjacent to the areas indicating
the presence of hydrogen sulfide. The report of
fishing docks floating down the river after the
cables that anchor it then snap where this algae
or ooze has accumulated is indirect evidence of
the corrosive effects of the hydrogen sulfide.
This ooze or slime sediments into the gravel beds
and chokes the very life bed of the river. These
important gravel beds are where the fish lay their
eggs and home to the many of the small insects and
fish that provide the base for the food chain.
Reports of several water quality parameters that
have deteriorated including pH, phosphate, NH3,
turbidity, suspended solids, and DO. The pH is
lowering to dangerous levels. This can be seen
in reports of small fish and water born insects
swimming out of the river when heavy rains form
streamlets up the banks in an ill-fated attempt
to escape the low pH or acid conditions. Another
is phosphate from the animal's feeds, waste water
treatment plants, fertilizers, pesticides, and
livestock waste. This leads to alga blooms in
the rivers and lakes that contribute to the problem
in the bottom of lake that are then flushed to the
river. The ooze also creates problems with turbidity
and suspended solids. Turbidity is the opacity of
the water or how much light is blocked. Suspended
solids are the amount of waste floating in the water
column. The oxygen level is measured in ppm and
labeled as dissolved oxygen or DO. The DO can be
seen bottoming out and even reaching zero ppm at
night during electricity generation. This can be
followed by the web page dealing with the rivers
and dams provided by the Corp of Engineers. This
can also be seen when the photosynthetic cycle of
algae pulls the oxygen out of the water. A bayou in
Freeport, Texas suffered from this back in the
seventies. Large amounts of phosphates and nitrogen
were dumped via washing machines into Oyster Bayou
causing huge algae blooms. At night there were large
fish die-offs. It was found that the alga blooms were
pulling the oxygen from the water at night suffocating
the fish. This was directly attributed to the waste
from the washing machines and the levels of nitrogen
and phosphate in the detergent. This is what is
happening to a lesser degree within the White and
North Fork River systems (at this time).
Several methods have been enacted to try to mitigate
these problems with little success. Cups or blades
were placed on the generators to aerate the water
and raise the DO level. Inspecting the dam reports
on the web, this makes little difference and in fact
the DO levels have dropped to zero while the damn
was generating. This can also condense and intensify
the poisoning effect of the suspended proteins within
the water column. This is the same principle used in
fish tanks called a protein fractionating column or
protein skimmer. This consists of a vertical column
that air and water and injected to separate and remove
the protein. The difference here is the protein is
separated out but not removed from the water. This
is sometimes seen as brownish-white foam. DO analyzers
were place to monitor the levels of dissolved oxygen
in the water. These are placed within the faster
moving water thus elevating the reading as the water
movement aerates and raises the DO of the water.
These analyzers need to be placed in both fast and
slow water to get an accurate measurement of these levels.
There are talks of using minimal flow to help
the ecology of the river. This will not help,
but only poison the river more. If the two
rivers are having this many difficulties then
adding more of what is poisoning it will not
cure it! In the court case of Public Utility
District No. 1 vs. Washington department of
Ecology, it was found the state may use minimal
flows to help maintain the Dosewallips River as
long as the water quality meets or beats the
specified standards. The minimal flows proposed
for both the White and North Fork Rivers will
harm, not help the ecology within their waters.
More monitoring of the rivers must be done to
find out how to preserve the rivers and the
beauty. Several types of analyzers should be
placed within the rivers to measure water
parameters. These would consist of more DO
analyzers placed in fast and slow flowing
areas. This will give a better idea of the
true DO levels. There should also be biological
(BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) tests
performed on the water. These will tell the
levels of waste and chemical that will starve
the water for oxygen. The turbidity and suspended
solid levels need to be quantified. These qualities
will lead to the cloudy water that is starting to
be seen.
The ecology in both the White and North Fork
River are shutting down at all levels. The
sowbugs, scuds, and sculpins are smaller if
not completely absent. There is an increase
in the numbers of leaches and detrimental
forms of snails. This has had a trickle up
effect to the trout within the rivers resulting
in smaller and fewer in fish numbers. The area
has grown-up and is famous for the fishing for
trout. This fame was great enough to be mentioned
in an episode of the television show MASH. Many
companies have been started in the area (ex:
Ranger Boats) and enjoyed success based on the
fishing of the area. It seems many do not realize
what is happening or do not care. This is a
shame! I am an out-of-stator who is willing
to drive ten hours to enjoy the great setting
and fishing. My father semi-retired there because
he liked it so much. Let's protect the North Fork
and White Rivers for our enjoyment and the enjoyment
of future generations. I know I would like to teach
my three year old how to fly fish on these two
rivers and watch her eyes gleam as she lands her
first fish – as I did over fifteen years ago!
Thanks,
David Vincent, B.S.
Environmental Biology from University of Houston - Clear Lake
406 Pine Mills Drive
League City, Texas 77573
281-538-2554
Email: david.vincent@emsi-air.com

My wonderful wife, Joan, (above) frowning at 11 dead
Stripers I grouped together. They were all
found in less than a 10 foot circle.
Thank you for your time.
Fox Statler
P.O.B. 1352
Salem, AR 72576
sowbugstatler@centurytel.net
(870) 895-2678