Originally Posted by
redietz
I agree with you that his logic was very flawed, even if do think that color is low on the importance scale.
I think you're making a possibily unfounded assumption in your truth table (which remind's me of Pascal's wager) and that is that "wager for color" necessarily means that flies are more effective if color matters. Let's assume for sake of argument that color does matter. What we perceive as the correct color (in a fly that is not yet wet) may look entirely different to the fish, especially after it's wet. Wager "for color" if this is case may cause us to not try a more effective fly which doesn't appear to us to be correct.
An angler only has to match color once when color matters for the truth table to be accurate. Whether an angler can always match color does not invalidate the truth table. Result will always equal or better when we try to match color.
Regards,
Silver
"Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy