Well, I am here and I am interested.
You will notice that the term "weight" was first used in quotes in my post above. However, your own Rosetta Stone (which I found most helpful and even printed an laminated for future use) connects the ERN to the AFTMA "Weight". I assume that this is because we buy this stuff by the "weight" and not by the ERN. I have yet to see one of your terms on a rod or box in a fly shop. I fully understand the disconnect there as well as the connect. While the term may not be correct, it is the one in most common use. I do not hear anyone saying he has a #7 rod. He or she always says they have a 7 weight rod.
I also understand that this has nothing to do with the forward cast. It is all with loading the rod on the back cast. I need 30 feet of line behind me to load the rod properly. Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I routinely have more or less line on my back cast, your Rosetta Stone is useless as it is based on the 30 foot figure.
I design wide area wireless networks for a living. I live by measurements. My systems' performance is defined by measurements. Measurements are good. Give me a way to measure something and I am a happy camper. A couple of people on this board referred me to your system and provided a link when I asked how to go about determining which line an old bamboo rod I came by would take.
I am impressed with your system. I can appreciate the work you went through to develop this system. However, I would appreciate it if, in the future, you would refrain from telling me what to discuss and where to discuss it.