+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Fluorocarbon Leader/Tippet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange City, Iowa
    Posts
    476

    Default Fluorocarbon Leader/Tippet

    I read somewhere a while back that fluorocarbon leader/tippet material was not recommended for dry flies as it tends to sink faster then standard mono leaders. I was wondering how many others found this to be turn .... or not ?? Is using fluorocarbon tippets on drys not a good idea ?

    Thanks,

    Mike
    "The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of that which is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope" -John Buchan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Western Washington
    Posts
    2,059
    Blog Entries
    27

    Default

    I use fluorocarbon tippet on all my dry flies. My leaders are mono but the tippet is fluoro. The 18 to 24 inches of fluoro has little to do with the sinking of a dry fly (unless maybe you use size 26 or something) and the better invisibility far out weights any sinking issue. Try it you will like it.

    Larry ---sagefisher---

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange City, Iowa
    Posts
    476

    Default

    Thanks for the info. I don't really fish allot of dry flies, sizes #10-12, as a rule but wanted to try out a few patterns this weekend. Will give the fluoro., tippets a try.

    Mike
    "The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of that which is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope" -John Buchan

  4. #4

    Default

    I use furled thread leaders and flourocarbon tippet for all of my trout fishing. Anything 5x and smaller I have never had an issue. I have noticed a higher sink rate with my bass tippet though....8# and up. So I use mono for my bassbug rigs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange City, Iowa
    Posts
    476

    Default

    Great info Silver thanks.
    "The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of that which is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope" -John Buchan

  7. #7

    Default

    I use flourocarbon tippet down to 6x. I use floatant on it and it works fine.
    The man who coined the phrase "Money can't buy happiness", never bought himself a good fly rod!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Woodland, CA USA
    Posts
    1,513

    Default

    it doesn't matter to me. i use FC and mono, whatever comes to hand. as far as invisibility goes, if I can see it, and I can, then an animal which lives in water can see it too.
    ‎"Trust, but verify" - Russian Proverb, as used by Ronald Reagan

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Just as 'Something to think about'. There were/are a lot of fly fishers that think, for dry fly fishing, the tippet portion should be under the surface. That's because apparently 'on' the surface the tippet gives off a definite impression on the water and shadow under it. A tippet below the surface is not nearly as visible. Now, does using a tippet that floats versus one that sinks actually make a difference? Some authors like Bergman and Gordon thought so. I don't recall reading anything about this in recent literature and the trout aren't talking either.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange City, Iowa
    Posts
    476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Allan View Post
    Just as 'Something to think about'. There were/are a lot of fly fishers that think, for dry fly fishing, the tippet portion should be under the surface. That's because apparently 'on' the surface the tippet gives off a definite impression on the water and shadow under it. A tippet below the surface is not nearly as visible. Now, does using a tippet that floats versus one that sinks actually make a difference? Some authors like Bergman and Gordon thought so. I don't recall reading anything about this in recent literature and the trout aren't talking either.
    Actually this makes allot of sense if you think about it. I don't fish dries for trout but the same principle applies I would think.

    Mike
    "The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of that which is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope" -John Buchan

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Leader/Tippet Ring/Tippet?
    By Joe Billingsley in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-03-2015, 06:48 PM
  2. Flourocarbon Tippet vs. Fluorocarbon Fishing line
    By JohnnyB in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-13-2008, 01:42 PM
  3. Which Fluorocarbon Tippet?
    By Orthoman in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-24-2008, 06:30 PM
  4. Tippet/Leader
    By Colt45 in forum Warm water Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-11-2005, 05:24 PM
  5. Best Fluorocarbon Tapered Leader and Tippet Matl.?
    By Migs in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-17-2005, 12:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts