+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Nymphs, a less single sided view.

  1. #1
    AlanB Guest

    Default Nymphs, a less single sided view.

    Usually when we think of a nymph we think along the lines of the original PTN of a fly with tail, body, thorax and thorax cover. Nymphs haven't always been this way. GEM Skues tied his "in the round". I don't know if this will make much of a difference, but I would like to. To that end I've tied some nymphs in the round. The plan is to fish today's standard tying until I'm having good results, then to change it for one of the ones tied in the round, and note the difference, if there is any.

    Here's some of the nymphs I've tied to try this with, along with the standard dressings. With the obvious differences I've tried to keep them as similar as possible.
    Nymphs in the round_0001.jpg
    Has anyone else tried this? Do you think there will be much, if any, difference?

    Cheers,
    A.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ashburn, Virginia
    Posts
    7,867

    Default

    Alan

    Very nice flies. Charlie Brooks tied many of his nymphs, especially stoneflies, "In the Round". I hate spending a lot of time tying flies that I know stand a good chance ending up snagged on the bottom because that's where the fish are; Brooks' flies are pretty easy to tie and very effective. I'm sure yours will prove to be, too.

    Regards,
    Scott

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,545

    Default

    My opinion, and it is not worth much, but, I feel you will see a marked improvement with those tied in the "round". They are very close to looking like a "flymph" and the "flymph" is a "go-to" for me. I will look forward to your comparison report. I really do think you will see more action from the tied in the "round" due to more "movement" of the material in the current which looks like "food" to the fish. Keep us in the loop.....
    Warren
    Fly fishing and fly tying are two things that I do, and when I am doing them, they are the only 2 things I think about. They clear my mind.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,076

    Default

    The topic pops up now and again as tiers discover or rediscover Brooks writings on this side of the pond. My fly box contains patterns that are regular as well as those 'in the round' and sure enough, they both catch fish.

    What I never liked about adhering to 'in the round' as dogma, is that there are key triggers built in regular patterns that would be pointless and maybe even counterproductive to replicate 'in the round'. For example, flashback wingcases would become flashy thoraxes (or omitted altogether). While there may be times where they might work, I have often found a little flash can be effective, and a lot of flash can kill a pattern. As with everything else, the philosophy has its place, but there is no single solution to the problem, in my mind.

    Postscript: It is often overlooked that many of Brooks' noted stonefly patterns were not tied completely 'in the round'. For example, there's no way you can tie a forked biot tail and have it look the same from all angles. A technicality perhaps, but an illuminating one never the less.
    Last edited by whatfly; 07-27-2014 at 06:37 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kapaa, hawaii
    Posts
    5,480
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Alan,
    Brooks actually dove in the river to watch nymphs' actions and then decided that since they were "tumbling " as they became dislodged, there was no " top" or "bottom". Thus, the lack of a wing case on his nymphs.
    His primary nymph was the big Western Stonefly on his home waters of the a Madison River.

    This is from his book "the Living River " where he compares his pattern (The Montana Stone Nymph) to the big stonefly. Both pretty ugly in my opinion.


    Last edited by Byron haugh; 07-27-2014 at 07:30 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woodbine, MD
    Posts
    703

    Default

    I'm very much a fan of "in the round". I've long suspected that the main reason nymphs are tied with an obvious top and bottom has more to do with wishing to be seen as more "scientific" than a wet fly angler; not because they catch more fish. (Not that both don't catch fish.)
    Bob

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Grand Junction CO. U.S.A.
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Been doing it for years. Sometimes less is more.


    Size 22 Bling Baetis:



    I consider Flymphs tied in the round. I nymph with them 90% of the time.



    Don't forget the Polish Nymphs:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kapaa, hawaii
    Posts
    5,480
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I have two of Brooks' books. Really like his writing. I have not made up my mind about his concept of "tying in the round", but, just to play devil 's advocate, other than reducing the time of tying, why not tie the nymph as it exists in nature.....legs underneath and wing case(s) on the top. As a real nymph would tumble, would not each "side" show? If so, why tie only one side? As I said, except to save tying time?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Grand Junction CO. U.S.A.
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byron haugh View Post
    I have two of Brooks' books. Really like his writing. I have not made up my mind about his concept of "tying in the round", but, just to play devil 's advocate, other than reducing the time of tying, why not tie the nymph as it exists in nature.....legs underneath and wing case(s) on the top. As a real nymph would tumble, would not each "side" show? If so, why tie only one side? As I said, except to save tying time?
    If that were the case realistic patterns would produce better than standard nymphs. I am not aware of this being the case, but I could be wrong. I suppose if you can calculate the exact body density of each individual nymph. Not to mention species. And, get it/them to tumble exactly as a natural would while attached to your tippet, you would be on to something. I do not see many realistic patterns winning trout competitions. I do see a lot of generic attractors winning though. There comes a point when the fisherman is caught by the pattern and not the trout.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Woodland, CA USA
    Posts
    1,513

    Default

    I like the Bling Baetis above...would you please share the pattern?
    ‎"Trust, but verify" - Russian Proverb, as used by Ronald Reagan

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. OFF TOPIC - Amateur Go Pro Camera view of Earth from 98,000 ft
    By Silver Creek in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2015, 02:20 AM
  2. single material fly
    By rainbowchaser in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2010, 10:57 PM
  3. single-built?
    By herefishy in forum Rod Building: Cane and Graphite
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 02:44 AM
  4. A different point of view
    By in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-03-2005, 05:49 PM
  5. Ausable...another view
    By brookid in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-22-2005, 03:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts