More evidence of how stocking sucks...

[markgraumlich]

http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/article.php?art_id=8756

I realize that not all waters can support natural reproduction.

[Big Bad Wulff]

As with most things the government does...

[Chuck S]

Stocking is a necessity for several reasons including stocking waters that have had a fish kill, etc or otherwise decimated fish population. Additionally it's a superb tool for introducing a species where none lived before and the abundance of great Rainbow fisheries across the US, or the many farm ponds across the midwest, as evidence of that. Adding to that we have a huge number of fisheries across the US and elsewhere that are put and take fisheries and these would collapse without supplemental stocking. A huge stocking success is the trout fishery that exists today in the North Platte river and tributaries here in Wyoming and Colorado which was devoid of salmonids (trout) prior to the pioneers stocking them there. On the other hand, as the article points out, stocking is often used in situations that dictate otherwise. Stocked, Native, Wild and mixed fisheries all have their place and it often takes paying attention to nature that tells us which is best (humans being part of nature).

[NJTroutbum]

Well said Chuck.

[Lotech]

I pretty much depend on put and take lakes for about 2 meals a month. We are actually having fried trout for dinner tonight. Stocking those lakes is a major source of revenue for licenses and sporting goods retailers. It does however, need to be done with a large measure of education.

[O. Mykiss]

Whether stocking is a positive or negative depends on where and how they are stocked. One positive: Stocking catchables next to the road discourages the bait anglers from walking a quarter mile to where there are more wild fish to be caught.

Another: Stocking rainbow fry in the High Sierra means that lakes that have no feeder streams can still have a viable rainbow fishery. Actually, without original stocking, none of our alpine wilderness lakes would have trout of any kind, and wouldn't that be a shame?

[maodiver]

Whether stocking is a positive or negative depends on where and how they are stocked. One positive: Stocking catchables next to the road discourages the bait anglers from walking a quarter mile to where there are more wild fish to be caught.

Another: Stocking rainbow fry in the High Sierra means that lakes that have no feeder streams can still have a viable rainbow fishery. Actually, without original stocking, none of our alpine wilderness lakes would have trout of any kind, and wouldn't that be a shame?

Unless you are a yellow legged frog. Non native animals are a problem to me, be they brown trout in the catskills, stripers in the Sacramento Delta, or Atlantic Salmon in British Columbia. Kinda hypocritical to complain about asian carp, zebra mussels, NZMS, etc, and not talk about the effects of Bluegill, LMB, etc.

[EdD]

Of course if we are going to talk about the carp, zebra mussels, bluegill, and LMB in a disparaging way, let's not stop there. Let's include cattle, horses, domestic dogs and cats, and, oh yeah, us. "Good" or "bad" often depends on ones viewpoint. What is the definition of a weed? When I was an agriculture major the definition was "a plant out of place". In other words, a plant where we didn't want it. A corn plant in a wheat field would be a weed. An oak tree in a pine plantation is a weed. Of course we have now drifted quite far afield and toward the realm of philosophy and semantics, but that is the hazard of long threads online.
Warm regards to all,
Ed

[NJTroutbum]

Whether stocking is a positive or negative depends on where and how they are stocked. One positive: Stocking catchables next to the road discourages the bait anglers from walking a quarter mile to where there are more wild fish to be caught.

Another: Stocking rainbow fry in the High Sierra means that lakes that have no feeder streams can still have a viable rainbow fishery. Actually, without original stocking, none of our alpine wilderness lakes would have trout of any kind, and wouldn't that be a shame?

Tell that to the Alpine lakes of Washington State. They "used" to have a wonderful wild fishery. But God Forbid it wasn't "native"....they threatened a salamander and fishermen were trampling wildflowers. So they were killed off. Makes no sense.

[Gandalf]

Whether stocking is a positive or negative depends on where and how they are stocked. One positive: Stocking catchables next to the road discourages the bait anglers from walking a quarter mile to where there are more wild fish to be caught.

Another: Stocking rainbow fry in the High Sierra means that lakes that have no feeder streams can still have a viable rainbow fishery. Actually, without original stocking, none of our alpine wilderness lakes would have trout of any kind, and wouldn't that be a shame?

So bait fisherman do not deserve to catch wild trout, huh? And people wonder why fly fisher people are seen as snobs.