+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Does lifting a line off the water cause noise that puts down fish?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Petaluma, Ca, USA
    Posts
    1,660

    Default

    Lefty IS absolutely correct.
    Improper lifting or ripping the line from the water creates a LOT of noise underwater.
    I too, have spent some time diving and the advise to submerge one's head underwater and listening to a line being ripped is GOOD. Depending on conditions sound can be good (Dorado?) or sound can be detrimental (troutoids). It is for sure, that learning to be "soundless" would be QUITE advantageous as one could go from soundless to sound if desired, but NOT having the skill, would leave one no option but to be noisey.
    One of my pet peeves is "slurping" anglers.
    Spey casting anyone? VERY FEW spey casters have learned not to slurp.
    .....lee s.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by randyflycaster View Post
    In the current edition of Mid Atlantic Fly Fishing Guide Lefty Kreh writes that lifting the line, even a foot of it, off the water will cause noise underwater that will put down fish. He recommends, therefore, retrieving line so that only the leader is lifted off the water.


    The question was not improperly lifting the line. It was not noisily, rapidly, rashly, or any other adjective. Placing an a adjective such as "improperly" creates a tautology. One could say lifting the line "silently" and say that Lefty is wrong.

    The question is how the Lefty's recommendation to take in all the line up to the leader is to be interpreted. Is it all the time as the the statement seems to suggest? If so, Lefty is wrong in my opinion. I believe it is not necessary to strip in all the line up to the leader before recasting in every cast to avoid spooking the fish. I don't know of anyone that does that in every case.

    I think Lefty would be surprised if we interpreted his statement to be in every case. Although Lefty does not use a conditional "if" or "when" to limit his statement, I think it is a presupposition or assumption that the angler must make when interpreting the meaning of his statement. To do otherwise to me is so obviously wrong that one has to make this logical presupposition to understand what Lefty means.
    Last edited by Silver Creek; 04-20-2012 at 04:23 PM.
    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    479

    Default

    One thing is for certain. I need to lay off of the baked beans a day or tow before wading for trout!

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john2 View Post
    If you go back to "Lessons with Lefty" he'll show you how to pick a line off the water.
    I haven't read the MAFF article that started this thread, so I may be totally off base with this. But I would tend to agree that the best backcasts start with pickup under enough tension that the leader is about all that is still in contact with the water. I have Joan Wullfs flycasting book and video, and have read both Jaworowski's "The Cast" and Kreh's "Longer Flycasting" and they teach the same thing. So I think if you are starting the backcast the way Kreh, Wullf, and Jaworowski all recommend you are only lifting the leader.

  5. #35

    Default

    Forgot to add that my point is that making a good backcast avoids the problem of ripping line or making much noise, that is a win-win for the angler. I believe that picking up before coming under tension when dry fly fishing, making that popping sound as the sunken leader pops the fly under water, does spook fish.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    I was taught the "C" cast pick up as a method to elevate the line so only the leader is on the water when the backcast begins, but it still picks line up or elevates it off of the water. I don't see how you can pick "only" the leader off of the water unless you begin the cast with only the leader on the water.

    http://www.garyborger.com/2010/02/03/the-c-pickup/
    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Petaluma, Ca, USA
    Posts
    1,660

    Default

    Silver,
    You just said it yourself...."only the leader is on the water when the backcast begins." Especially if, as I was taught, "the cast" is the speed up and stop portion of the stroke. The "pickup" portion of the stroke is already done when the power to stop portion takes place.
    Some of us can only "pick up" say 19' of line, so 22' of line out would cause unnessary noise (and according to the openning post Lefty does say noise.) I must retrieve line to the 19' mark or else.....?
    ....lee s.
    Last edited by lee s; 04-21-2012 at 08:10 PM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    Lee,


    But the original quote was to "retrieve the line so only the leader is lifted of the water." With the C cast pickup, you do not retrieve the line.


    Quote Originally Posted by randyflycaster View Post
    Lefty Kreh writes that lifting the line, even a foot of it, off the water will cause noise underwater that will put down fish. He recommends, therefore, retrieving line so that only the leader is lifted off the water.


    I think that is point of contention. Do you really need to ALWAYS "retrieve the line". It think not and that is why I believe that Left is directing this comment only at certain situations.
    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  9. #39

    Default

    Back to my other point: If Lefty is correct, the roll cast should be obsolete on smooth water. We can't make an effective roll cast if only the leader is on the water.
    Randy

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    That is correct. Not only that, but a roll cast sprays water in the direction that the fly will land. I think smooth water does not in itself make a roll cast a poor choice. It also needs to be shallow, clear and hold spooky trout. That is why I think Lefty's statement is conditional. Otherwise it makes no sense to me.
    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. First night on water, first fish on fly I tied
    By tjulian in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-18-2014, 02:11 AM
  2. Like a fish out of water in Vegas
    By Byron haugh in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 03:11 AM
  3. The water might be warm, but I'm still catching fish.....
    By AllenOK in forum Warm water Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-26-2012, 08:26 PM
  4. Picking the line up off the water
    By Capt Chris M in forum A Learning Experience, Pass it On.
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2012, 03:22 PM
  5. First fish on my new 2wt and a few hours on the water.
    By nighthawk in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-31-2007, 03:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts