Just to weigh in with a differing concern.
I don't believe ANYONE should be allowed to 'use', 'kill', 'consume', etc., an endangered species like the Bald Eagle.
Native American 'Indians' INCLUDED.
This bowing to their 'culture' is overblown.
Some folks from China believe that the use of powdered Rhino horn is beneficial to them, yet are they to be allowed to kill these animals at will to get the horns?
Cultures in the Carribean have sacrificed different animals, as have many others, for religious reasons. Should they be allowed to practice this now?
Why can't the Native Americans use 'imitaiton' eagle feathers in their ceremonies? It certainly doesn't keep them from conducting the event. Nor would it 'change' it in any functional way. So they would have to 'modify' ot 'change' some to accomodate the law. We ALL have to do that. Whats WRONG with it?
If your beliefs were that you should be able to kill and eat all you can catch, since your great great great grandfather was able to, why is THAT any different.
The laws written to protect our natural resources should apply to all, regardless of where they were born, what they may choose to believe, or what they think their 'culture' entitles them to.
Making changes, adapting to the changing world, both culturally and physically, is what human progress is all about.
Having different 'classes' of citizens under the law, with 'priveledges' based solely on heredity, is, frankly, disgusting if not appalling.
The benefits of citizenship are extended to all with the understanding that belonging to that group requires subjecting ourselves to the rules or laws that apply equally to all.
If protecting the Eagle, or any other creature, is considered beneficial to the whole, then such protection should be enforced equally accross the population.
AND, as far as I'm concerned, doing the 'correct' thing in todays world means NOT killing Bald Eagles. I find abhorrent anyone that does so, regardless of whether or not it's 'allowed'. You can still do the right thing, regardless of the law.
ANY 'culture' that advocates the killing of endangered species or taking more than the allowed legal limits of fish or game because their ancestors did so is worthy only of disdain.
I know this opinion isn't 'politcally correct', but I don't particularly care. Then again, maybe it SHOULD be. Chris is correct, making such deeds 'politically incorrect' may help stop such practices EVEN among groups that are 'allowed' to do such things.
Buddy
------------------
[url=HTTP://HOMETOWN.AOL.COM/RSAN2708/INDEX.HTML:509d7]HTTP://HOMETOWN.AOL.COM/RSAN2708/INDEX.HTML[/url:509d7]
It Just Doesn't Matter....