+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: Do you put wings on your dries?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    191

    Default Do you put wings on your dries?

    Let's say you're tying a dry fly with the hackle wrapped in the same fashion as a traditional Catskill dry (not a parachute style dry). Do you incorporate wings, or just use hackle?

    Are the wings necessary, or are they more important to the tier than they are to the trout?

    Andrew

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Golden, Co. USA
    Posts
    798

    Default

    Simulations of what a trout see's don't show much of a wing. So...if I can get away without.
    They all fit the definition of "lure" anyway.

  3. #3
    Guest

    Default

    Andrew;
    I'm going to cross the line here and say no! Wings are a pain and time consuming and the fish can't see 'em anyway. I think that they are important only to the tiers ego and that the trout don't care! I could tie 3 - 4 fly's in the time it takes me to tie in one set of wings!!
    There I've said it and I'm not sorry!! I'll just get out the steel underwear and take the hits!! It's open season on Cactus Jack!!
    Good post Andrew. Should really stir the pot, but still teach your new tiers how to do it the traditional way. You may have some Rising Stars there!!

    ------------------
    I feel more like I do now than I did when I got here!

    Cactus

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Nunica Mi U S A
    Posts
    2,511

    Default

    Jack you know the wings are there (preferably in orange or chartreuse)so us blind guys know where the fly is at. Without them even a mediocre caster like me has no problem putting a fly clean out of sight. If I could see every midge coming off the water like you do I might think about omiting them.

    ------------------
    all leaders tangle; mine are just better at it than most. Jim
    I can think of few acts more selfish than refusing a vaccination.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Mattydale NY
    Posts
    1,949

    Default

    Hummm...Do I add them ? Yes...

    Do I think they are "Needed"...ummm to catch fish....Not positive either way I know they are what creates the airfoil that sets the hook upright in the water!!!...And keeps it from sitting face down in the surface film..well if the fly be "Traditionally" Hackled...I use A.K.Best's Hackling method religiously, Yes even on the catskill tyes...Shoot me if'in you must...lol..but I like the method and what it imparts to the fly!
    As I like wings on my flies...It's up to the tyer himself when you get right down to it...Do as YOU wish...and I hope the fish agree with your wishes!.

    ------------------
    "I've often wondered why it is that so many anglers spend so much money on,and pay so much attention to.the details on the wrong end of the fly line.If they took as much care in selecting or tying their flies as they did in the selection of the reel and rod,They might be able to gain the real extra edge that makes it possible to fool a fish that has,in fact,seen it all before" A.K.Best

    Everyone wants to excel in this sport but at the same time we let traditionalists place restrictions on our tactics, methods, and ideas. I always assumed that fly fishing was a sport that allowed imagination, creation, adaptation, investigation, dedication, education, revelation? : Fox Statler, On Spinners (Not the dainty Dry Fly kind) "Spinner'd Minner Fly"

    "Wish ya great fishing"

    Bill
    Wish ya great fishing,Bill

  6. #6

    Default

    RW here,'

    I seldom tie in wings on my working dry flies. For show flies I do, but I don't see the need for wings in actual use. From below, the trout can't see them unless they're spentwings. I use wings on my wets, but not on my dries. A trout, in his window of vision will see and hit a good stiff hackle, high floating variant just as quickly as he will hit a winged fly. all other things being equal. Wingless, dry variants were Art Flicks favorite flies. If they were good enough for him they're good enough for me.

    Practically speaking, I think wings only add aesthetic properties to a dry fly for the benefit of the fisherman, not the fish. I think the trout could care less.

    Example: If some folks think a trout won't hit a wingless fly because they "can't" see the wings, what in the world makes them think a trout "will" hit a dry fly with a big, unnatural chunk of steel sticking out of its butt that the fish obviously "can see". The fact that they do hit the fly is pretty clear to me. They "don't" care about the presence of the hook or the absence of the wings. So why waste my precious woodie flank on the dries, when I can save them for use on my wets.

    Later, RW

    ------------------
    "We fish for pleasure; I for mine, you for yours." -James Leisenring on fishing the wet fly-




    [This message has been edited by Royal Wulff (edited 27 December 2005).]
    "The value of trout is simply that they exist" <Frank Weisbarth>

  7. #7
    Guest

    Default

    Y'know, I totally agree with RW...it's always been a mystery to me how we could possibly believe that any fly with the hook sticking out of it's posterior could trick any thinking, observant trout. Hmmmmm?

    ------------------
    There's snow on the roof but the fire still burns in the oven.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Chicago, Il, USA
    Posts
    1,459

    Default

    So many theories:

    Vince Marinaro thought that large wings were a triggering device, that trout could see them, and that in fact, it would be the first thing the trout sees. Marinaro used oversized wings on his famous thorax patterns.

    One of his disciples, Datus Proper, argued for wingless dryflies in "What The Trout Said." Proper believed that the hackle (in what he referred to as a Hackle Fly) represented both legs and wings.

    Of course, Haystacks, Comparaduns and Sparkle Duns all lack the distinctive wings of a Catskill.

    My guess is that separate wings are probably not needed. That said, they probably don't hurt either.

    I think hackle tip wings are a pain and lately have been using either turkey flats, t-base, wood duck or mallard for wings. This winter, to make it even simpler, I'm not splitting the wings but rather keeping it to a single post.

    I know some have a theory that mayflies hold their wings together when on the water. I'm pretty sure the single post thing will work, but I'll see come Spring.

    As for the hook, the best explanation is that trout look for positives, not negatives. The look for what they expect to be there (wings, legs, body, tail, dimpling etc.) and not for what they don't (hook, tippet).

    My $0.02.

    -Steven

  9. #9
    Guest

    Default

    I normaly put the wings on, just don't want to take a change that a fish will reject it because there are no wings. I will skip them on small flies, size 20 and under.

    -ST

    ------------------
    [url=http://www.flyfishingwis.com:4f692]www.flyfishingwis.com[/url:4f692]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    28433 N State Lamoni, Ia 50140
    Posts
    3,950

    Default

    I tie most dry flies as paraloops so there are no wings. They have worked for me.

    Rick

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Bonefish on dries
    By Rocketfish in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-07-2015, 08:56 PM
  2. no hackle dries
    By Warm Water Fly Fisher in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-14-2007, 09:12 PM
  3. Tiny dries, upright wings?
    By Fisherpup in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-02-2007, 10:43 PM
  4. Anyone tie dries w/o dubbing?
    By shaneroyce in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-10-2006, 03:17 PM
  5. Hackled dries
    By RL in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-13-2005, 12:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts