Interesting choice for head of EPA

[Rawthumb]

The EPA is an "administration" and is headed by an "administrator," and it is in a small category of executive agencies within the govt., as opposed to commissions run by commissioners or agencies run by cabinet level "Secretaries." Some "Administrators" report to "Secretaries," but not true of the EPA. The Admin reports directly to the President. Bush has spoken of making the head of EPA a cabinet level position, which would make the head a "secretary." A number of people have left EPA, starting with the head of enforcement, and later Whitman. Some have been more vocal than others about the direction the WH has given EPA since 2001. The empirical evidence is that enforcement actions, civil and criminal are way down. The market for environ lawyers is way off too because the corp. defense/compliance work is not there.

Bush did something interesting in picking a career employee rather than a politico with proven allegiance to the ideology of the Repub. Party. But the EPA is still an exec agency and takes its marching orders form the Chief Executive. It will be interesting to see how this works out.

Bush nominates EPA scientist
to run controversial agency

Opts for career employee instead of politician

Steve Johnson
By Miguel Llanos
MSNBC

Updated: 1:57 p.m. ET March 4, 2005President Bush on Friday nominated Steve Johnson, the acting head of the Environmental Protection Agency, as his choice to continue in the post. A 24-year EPA employee, Johnson would become the first professional scientist to head the agency if confirmed by the Senate.

?He knows the EPA from the ground up and has a passion for its mission,? Bush said in announcing the nomination from the Roosevelt Room of the White House.

The president avoided nominating a politician to head an agency that's become a lightning rod for criticism from environmental activists and Democratic lawmakers.

Pesticides, toxics expertise

Johnson, who has specialized in pesticides and toxic substances, became acting EPA chief just six weeks ago after the previous chief, Mike Leavitt, was sworn-in as Bush's health secretary.

The president's nominee will require approval from the Senate, where most Democrats have been hostile toward the administration's environmental policies.

Christine Todd Whitman was Bush's first EPA chief and recently wrote a book critical of the more conservative ranks within the Republican Party. Both are Republicans and former governors; Leavitt of Utah and Whitman of New Jersey.

While moderates within the Republican Party, neither Whitman nor Leavitt were welcomed by environmentalists, who perceive the administration as favoring industry.

Non-politician stressed

Bush focused on Johnson's non-political credentials, stating that he expects Johnson to become ?the first professional scientist to lead the EPA.?

Johnson, for his part, echoed administration policy of balancing environmental and economic needs. ?If confirmed," he said with Bush by his side, "it will be my distinct privilege to serve you and our nation to continue to advance an environmental agenda while maintaining our nation?s economic competitiveness.?

And he praised the president for "great strides in environmental protection" during his administration.

Hot-button issues within the EPA's domain are global warming, air quality, ocean pollution and fuel efficiency.

The president's federal budget request would cut EPA spending by 5.6 percent from last year's $8.6 billion. The agency employs 18,000 people.

Johnson, 53, earned university degrees in biology and pathology and worked for Hazelton Laboratories and Litton Bionetics before joining the EPA.

Reaction from industry, activists
Sen. Jim Jeffords, a former Republican and now independent from Vermont, welcomed Johnson's nomination.

"His experience and temperament make him a solid choice to lead the agency at this time," Jeffords, a senior member of the Senate environment committee, said in a statement. "The Bush administration has the worst environmental record in history, and I am hopeful that given Steve's background and experience, he can bring a fresh and new approach."

A coalition of electricity utilities also had praise for Johnson.

"This act places a capable leader at the helm of an important agency," Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, said in a statement.

Segal noted that Johnson has twice been confirmed by the Senate, once as deputy EPA chief and before that as an assistant administrator.

Phil Clapp, head of the National Environmental Trust, called the nomination "a good sign because this is a professional appointment, not a political one.

"However," he added in a press statement, "it remains to be seen whether under Mr. Johnson the agency will be afforded some level of scientific independence on making environmental decisions."

The Sierra Club's director was more skeptical. In a statement, Carl Pope said "this is deja vu all over again."

While Johnson is "the best we could expect as a nominee from the Bush administration," Pope said, Whitman went to the EPA with environmental credentials "but the White House clearly called all the shots."

"When she left, we suspect out of frustration," Pope said, "the White House appointed Mike Leavitt as its frontman. We hope that Mr. Johnson can rise above the White House's expectations that he will be a figurehead."

[rnelson]

I believe it is probably better to have a career employee head a federal agency. If he worked his way up through the ranks that would be even better.

But, he is still serving at the whim of the President and has to adhere to the party line. Not likely that he will radically depart from the administration's policies.

[Gigmaster]

Actually, the EPA gets credit for having much more authority than they actually have. Their main function is to issue licenses, collect fees and regulate waste disposal. They do set some guidelines, and can do Environmental Impact Studies for Congress and the Legislature when requested, but their actual enforcement authority is limited to licensing violations. Mostly what they do is agree with the President, no matter what his position is. And any guidelines or regulations they come up with are subject to both Legislative, Executive and Judicial review and can be over-ridden by almost anyone higher up than G-5. All other Enforcement would be up to the Department of the Interior, OSHA, or other apropriate branch.
They are, in effect, mostly a 'Paper Tiger'.

I think you'll probably find that Mr. Johnson is also a "Paper Tiger". While he does have a BS in Biology and an MS in Pathology, he has never worked as a "professional scientist". At Hazelton Labs and Litton Bionetics he was Director Of Operations....an Administrator, not a "professional scientist". He has been an Administrator with the EPA for 24 years. The EPA does not do research. They contract it out to private firms. So that would not qualify as a job for a " professional scientist" either. He is a career goverment employee. So far, his main acomplishmnet has been to get the EPAs' budget reduced by 5.6%.

Make no mistake. He was selected for his loyalty to the Administration, not for any stand in issues, which he has never taken. He has consistantly backed Bushes' Clear Skies Bill, which takes a very weak stance on Mercury Pollution, and is very controversial. If confirmed, it will still be business as usual on the Hill.

[This message has been edited by Gigmaster (edited 28 March 2005).]

[This message has been edited by Gigmaster (edited 28 March 2005).]

[This message has been edited by Gigmaster (edited 28 March 2005).]

[This message has been edited by Gigmaster (edited 28 March 2005).]