+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: digital cameras???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Dubuque, IA USA
    Posts
    248

    Default digital cameras???

    Okay, having seen the pictures that some of you have posted here, I figure that this is a good place to ask. My wife and I are considering buying a digital camera, but admit that we don't know a whole lot about them. One of the local stores has a couple of Kodaks on sale right now that we may go take a look at - run around 200 bucks. Questions:
    *What do you use? What made you choose that camera over others?
    *When we go look at cameras, what are some specific things that we should be looking for?
    *Besides the camera itself, what are some other pieces of hardware that we should take into consideration? Add-ons and extras that you would suggest?
    *What should we avoid?
    *What other questions should I ask?
    Thanks much for all of your input. I appreciate all of the information that I pick up from this board.
    CJ

    ------------------
    The only limitations we have are the ones we put on ourselves.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Missoula, MT USA
    Posts
    547

    Default

    I don't really look for features because many of them are useless for me and if I want to add some texture or something I can do it in photoshop later. I'm waiting for the Pentax Optio WP, a submersible digital that is coming out next month and will cost $350. You might want to check it out also if you're on the water a lot, it has less features than others, but hey, you can take pictures underwater with it.

  3. #3
    Guest

    Default

    i use the Pentax Optio S5i, and heres why:

    1-size. its smaller than a pack of cigarrettes, so it easily slides into a front pocket when walking around without any unnecessary bulk or heaviness.

    2-5.0 megapixels=fantastic clarity and quality of prints

    3-macro and super-macro modes allow up-close photography such as is needed with flies.

    4-7x zoom, when including the digital zoom.

    5-cost. i got the camera and a 128mb memory card, which, with the built in 8mb allows me to take 200+ pictures at highest quality before needing to erase any, for around $350 delivered. the memory card was around $30, i think, but i dont remember for sure.

    the optio line also has a higher end camera with all the same features, plus a waterproof outer shell, allowing underwater photography, and for the occasional "dunking" it may take during your fishing adventures. i just carry a watertight, rolldown-type drybag.

    i am extremely satisfied with my choice. this was also my first digital camera purchase, so i am pleased with the research i did beforehand. i took the above considerations into account before any other considerations, and found the Optio to best suit my needs. not only does it exceed my expectations in the above criteria, it also holds its own in added bonuses such as video and sound recording, view screen, and included software. never did the name brand effect my choice.

    for the record, i am in no way affiliated with pentax. i am just very satisfied with my purchase.

  4. #4

    Default

    Al Campbell wrote a whole series for FAOL on Digital Cameras - Here is what to look for: [url=http://flyanglersonline.com/alcampbell/ac093002.html:9fde5]http://flyanglersonline.com/alcampbell/ac093002.html[/url:9fde5]

    ------------------
    LadyFisher, Publisher of
    FAOL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lake In The Hills. IL USA
    Posts
    4,010

    Default

    Hey there cklensky;
    Without commenting on others' choices, I own a Sony Cybershot DSC P92 with which I am very happy. At 5 megapixels capability I can print beautiful 8 X 10 prints. I also have a Sony VAIO laptop which has a memory stick slot in it so I can edit etc. any image almost immediately after capture. It is not the first digital camera I have owned but it is most compact. There are other cameras of equal or better quality that are even more compact though. Unless you plan to print your digital photos, there is no need to "overpixelize" however. Three megapixel resolution is more than adequate for e-mail, 3X5 prints and viewing on your computer monitor. You would not go wrong investigating the Sony line. Good Luck

    Mark

    ------------------
    I'd rather be in Wyoming!

  6. Default

    I use a Sony Cybershot DSC-F828 8mega Pixel.
    Big camera and a bit complicated for the novice.
    I do Advanced Ameture Photography thus the large Camera and lens.

    Looking forward to some great Fishing and Nature shots with it this year.
    I have only had it for about 6 months.

    Here is the Camera
    [url=http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/f828.html:12869]http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/f828.html[/url:12869]

    Here are some examples of what I have done with it so far.
    [url=http://public.fotki.com/Karz/digital_photography/:12869]http://public.fotki.com/Karz/digital_photography/[/url:12869]

    ------------------
    Jim Bolden Sr

    I caught a Fish so big once I couldn't weigh it.
    Took a picture of it and the picture weighed 20LBS! (My Dad)




    [This message has been edited by Battenkill Jim (edited 22 March 2005).]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    silicon valley, usa
    Posts
    570

    Default

    I'm very happy with my Canon digital cameras but I'm always nervous taking them around water. I tried a waterproof case for one but it was a pain to use.

    I'm waiting to see the Pentax Optio WP in person...then waiting for Dell to discount it a bit (they run frequent discounts on digital cameras). Looks like a good fishing camera to me...

  8. #8

    Default

    I'm with flytier... Pentex Optio.The small size and the picture qualty are hard to beat.I just put mine in a small freezer ziplock bag to keep the water out in case of a miss step.I've had good luck with it so far.
    John

  9. #9

    Default

    I love my Kodak DX6490. It takes GREAT pictures, as well as short videos. The reason I bought it was because it had 10x OPTICAL zoom. Optical zoom is the one you want, Digital zoom can make your pictures a little 'pixely'. At high levels of optical zoom Id recommend a tripod, the slightest move of your body while taking a picture at full 10x optical MAY cause the picture to blur, but I've had good luck with that.

    It also has a sports mode to help with the blurrs, and a night mode so you can take pictures in the dark without a flash, a black and white mode, and a sepia mode.

    This is a 4 Megapixel camera...these pictures are SHARP, but not the best out there.

    All in all, a VERY good cameral. Check out the reviews on Amazon.com, you'll like what you read.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Central Nevada
    Posts
    586

    Default

    I'll recommend the Pentax Optio WR and the new WP if you want a camera to take on the water, or in the rain & snow and to use for close-ups of flies and fish.

    Otherwise, the Kodaks are hard to beat. We buy Kodaks for family pictures and we get them at Costco. Costco always discounts and also always adds accessories to the standard cameras. You can take stuff back if it breaks...

    The Kodaks are by far the easiest to "plug and Play". You get a dock that plugs into your PC. Plug the cam into the dock and it charges the batteries. Take it off the dock and snap a few pics. Plug it back onto the dock and push the image transfer button and your photos are on the screen ready to view in a nice slide show. Could not be easier.

    We have Pentax, and Kodaks and like both really.

    If I had the bux, I'd get digi-Cannons; especially if you already have SLR lenses that will already fit them.

    Lots of good cameras in this day and age. Just go for all the megapixels you can afford. More is definately better. I have a 6.2 and could use a 8 or better for what I like to do. Get a minimum of 4 MP. Why? If you get a nice wide shot and want to crop it down to remove the unwanted parts of the image, if the MegaPixels (resoloution) of your camera is only 2 or 3.5 MP then the cropped picture will be all grainy and pretty worthless.

    I like the Sony images taken by Jim Bolden. He has a great camera too and paid a penny or two for it.

    I took this with a Kodak:



    Rich

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. GoPro cameras.
    By bgreer in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-18-2013, 06:13 PM
  2. Digital cameras: shutter delay?
    By LeoCreek in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-26-2009, 04:40 PM
  3. Thank heaven for digital cameras!
    By DG in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-04-2009, 07:32 PM
  4. Underwater cameras
    By Gnu Bee Flyer in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2005, 07:46 PM
  5. Security cameras at Cabela's
    By fcch in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-31-2005, 08:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts