+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: A bit of retrospect here:

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Draffenville, KY, USA
    Posts
    430

    Default A bit of retrospect here:

    In October of 2005 I was reading this forum and found a post that peaked my interest so much I printed it out, and still have it today. Jim Hatch added a post titled ?Warmwater Midges, Scuds, and Nymphs?. The gist of the post was that as much fun as it is to catch our warmwater prey on the surface, it is far more productive fishing midges, scuds and nymphs, or as he called them ?the normal bread and butter kritters that these fish routinely subsist on?. He, and others, go on to talk about favorites and suggestions of other sub-surface fare that have worked and the preference of different offerings by different species.

    The post made me examine my bluegill fishing since I had relocated to Kentucky from New England via a stint in Texas in 2001. Being mostly a cork popping bug bluegill and occasionally bass fly-fisherman, I had to admit that while I was having fun I was not as productive, number wise, as I might have been. I gathered the proper material and tied myself the requisite array of flies to move my quest deeper into the ponds and streams I fish. I must admit my fly fishing was much more enjoyable being able to add many more fish to the tally. While I still will throw a popper or rubber spider, I am much more likely to explore the depths than I once was.

    The point is that I think while many would not consider bringing up old, well-worn subjects that most would not find interesting, there may be one to whom the material is new and will make a difference in the way they fish and the enjoyment they get out of it.
    Clint
    in far west Kentucky

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portage, PA
    Posts
    2,900

    Default

    Same way I feel. I often look into the archives for reminders and to re-learn things I have forgotten over the years.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Lakeland, FL USA
    Posts
    2,193

    Default

    Having had the pleasure of fishing with Jim on his home lake a while back, I agree with him completely. I am fortunate to live on a very nice 50-acre lake outside of Atlanta that has a very healthy population of big hungry Bluegill and Redear Sunfish. My go-to pattern has always been an all black leech tied on a size 10 2XL hook. I find that I catch more fish, and certainly larger fish, subsurface than any topwater patterns. While jumbo-size bream can certainly be taken on poppers or other topwater patterns, they are much more inclined to take a subsurface pattern down where they hang out around submerged limbs and stumps. I sure miss Jim Hatch being here on the FAOL boards. I hope that he is doing well and enjoying himself in retirement.

    Jim Smith

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    28433 N State Lamoni, Ia 50140
    Posts
    3,946

    Default

    About 95% of my warmwater fly fishing is subsurface.
    That is what works best for me.

    Rick

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Richardson Texas
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Subsurface is where the fish catch most of their food, I find sub surface more satisfying for catching, surface is fun but not as good as in the fishes pantry.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NE Gwinnett Co., GA
    Posts
    5,939

    Default

    I completely agree with the opinion of fish eating more of what in the water than what's on the water. But, I like to fish a popper/hopper dropper rig. I am curious to know approximately what depth you are catching most of your subsurface fish. Where I fish most of the beds are in 4 ft. or less of water and that's where the fish are located.
    Want to hear God laugh? Tell him Your plans!!!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts