+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Split Thread Dubbing Loop

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kapaa, hawaii
    Posts
    5,480
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Darwin,
    I think the concept is well understood. Some have trouble with the practicum.

    Please correct me if Im wrong, but I believe this is a very old technique which originated with coarse, UN-waxed thread. In those OLD days, the thread, or more likely, the silk, was quite thick. To form a dubbing loop would be extremely bulky. With today's #12/#14 threads, not so much.

    Anyway, it is a very old method of dubbing and was born of relative necessity.....the threads of the day were just very bulky and un-waxed, which lent themselves to splitting the thread and inserting dubbing.
    Last edited by Byron haugh; 07-21-2014 at 03:32 AM.

  2. #12
    AlanB Guest

    Default

    I'm not sure how old the technique is, I first came across it in a series of articles in Fly Fishing and Fly Tying by Davie Wooton in the early 1990s. I learned to tie with the threads you describe Byron. The biggest problem was the build up of bulk from them. Modern threads have lead to a tendency for people to use far more thread than is needed. Splitting the thread means a dubbed section can be formed with one pass of thread. Using a dubbing loop leads to three layers of thread to form the same section.

    As for wax, I would rather buy my thread unwaxed, then add wax if and when I need it. I know Uni is available unwaxed, but have you ever tried to get any? No one stocks it. I would give the person who decided that I will use waxed thread, whether I want it or not, a good clout round t'ear hole, if I could find them!

    Cheers,
    A.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Beacon Falls, CT
    Posts
    1,371

    Default

    I've found that my most obvious problem was with a "dull" needle. I was trying to use a bodkin.
    Thanks for the reminder.

  4. #14
    AlanB Guest

    Default

    The exact sewing machine needle you want is a "Ball point needle" the very tip is rounded to not damage the thread. Go for one with a higher number. (Like hooks they get smaller the higher the number).

    I make my own using a Slipstream brass fly tube with the lining removed. Put the needle in the chuck of a drill so the chuck grips the tip end of the larger part of the needle. Set it running and taper the back end with a diamond file, a long slow taper 11 degrees is ideal. Then put the needle into a vice and put the tube over the taper you have created. One firm tap with a mallet and the two are one. I then put silicone tubing over the tube for a larger grip. Or you can pay Marc Petitjean lots of money for the same thing with a stainless steel tube.

    Cheers,
    A.
    Last edited by AlanB; 07-21-2014 at 03:51 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Beacon Falls, CT
    Posts
    1,371

    Default

    Being as lazy as I am, I simply built up layers of UV cement around the eye of a needle to facilitate handling and then colored it black with a waterproof marker so I could easily locate it. It meets my needs.

  6. #16

    Default

    @ AlanB: Uni thread is waxed or as they call it: bonded but it can still be split. All you need to do is to put some tension on the thread and then rub the thread up and down a few times with something dull, like the metal handle of a needle or the round edge of yr scissors. The heat or friction will break the bonding and the thread will split easily. Give it a try!
    Mart

  7. #17
    AlanB Guest

    Default

    Mart, Have been doing that for years. That isn't why I don't want the waxed. I want the choice, I don't blether wax all over the place when it isn't needed. Wax has its uses, when needed I'll add it to the part of the fly that needs it. The rest of the time I'd rather not have it. Years ago Uni was my primary thread, but I changed to UTC for a different reason, I like the vibrancy of the colour, which makes Uni look washed out by comparison.

    For a while I had access to Guttermann's Scala thread on 15000 meter spools. However, the supply was irregular, and some time ago I moves away from the supplier. Since then I've not been in a position to put in an order for the kind of quantities I would need to to order it from Guttermann. When I used Scala I realised that the major cost elements in fly tying thread are the spool and putting it on the spool. The standard Scala is finer than Uni 8/0 while being stronger than Uni 6/0. There is a finer version as well. Its spun rather than braided, so splits easily. The range of colours puts fly tying threads to shame. Its available is something like 12000 different shades. If that isn't enough Guttermann will custom dye it, if you order enough. Compared to buying Uni it costs about 1/25th of the price. And it is unwaxed.

    Thinking about the thread splitter from Stonfo, that would work well with Uni with the method you mention. Though I doubt I'll purchase one. It is a tool to do something I can do with a tool I already have. Keeping the number of tools down is more efficient. Though I am impressed by it as a piece of engineering.

    Cheers,
    A.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Clips for Split Thread Dubbing / Hackle
    By johnstoeckel in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-14-2015, 01:16 AM
  2. video - Split Thread Technique
    By Hans Weilenmann in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-11-2013, 11:29 AM
  3. Dubbing Brush or Dubbing Loop?
    By Gigmaster in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-05-2013, 10:51 PM
  4. Single Thread Dubbing or a Dubbing Loop?
    By Eight Thumbs in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 02:11 PM
  5. Dubbing Loop
    By Panman in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-10-2005, 06:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts