Earliest Reference
The information offered in another thread kind of peaked my interest. Let's see how many of you (of course I include myself) are willing to take up a challenge to investigate, identify and post here the first article or essay you can find that was written in a: book, pamphlet or magazine that describes the proportions of a Catskill Dry Fly. Specifically, you must cite the reference, by title and date, the author and the proportions.
Anyone up to this challenge?
Allan
Allan,
Didn't we do this about four or five years ago? Seems to me it garnered something like 100-plus responses. Or was that an inquiry about the first reference to Catskill style dry flies?
RW
"The value of trout is simply that they exist" <Frank Weisbarth>
I really think the Catskill fly style and proportion's were established long before the Catskill name was used to describe them. I can't wait to get home and do some digging in a few book's.
With respect to proportions of all parts of a Catskill Dry Fly, the earliest thing I can find, on a quick and dirty check in my library, complete with a diagram, is to be found at the top of page 38 of Eric Leiser's book: "THE COMPLETE BOOK OF FLY TYING", published in 1983. He gives the following proportions: Tail Length=Wing length; Hackle length=3/4 Wing Length or 1 1/2 Hook Gap: Body Length=2/3 Hook Shank.
However, a much earlier note on tail length and wing length is to be found in Art Flick's "Master Fly Tying Guide", at page 63 where he cites Al Brewster's story about Brewster's discussion with Rube Cross, during which the two finally agreed that "...the tail should be the same length as the hook shank..." They also agreed that the hackle should be "...1/8 to 1/4 inch larger than the gape of the hook." Flick's treatise was published in 1972.
Unfortunately, in the book: CATSKILL FLYTIER, by Harry Darbee and Mac Francis, published in 1977, there is no mention whatsoever of fly proportions. This is most interesting to me, as Darbee and Walt Dette started a fly tying business together as boys, and continued as partners for some time after both married. Their wives were also tiers in their business.
Regards!
I quickly scanned Rube cross' book but I was not able to locate any mention in it. Now the gauge in Eric's book is not the gauge that the Dette's used or use. Further the D&D's tore Rubes flies apart to see how they were tied, So I bet that Rube did make a reference somewhere before Eric's book. Rube also claimed that he was taught by Gordon but the is no verification from that. Another source would be Steenrod who was taught by Gordan. Those are the two that I would start my research on if I had anything written by Roy.
Hi RW,Originally Posted by Royal Wulff
On this site there have been threads about the definition of 'Catskill Dry Fly', 'Catskill Fly Tyer', and 'Catskill Patterns'. However, I don't think that this question, about the first written description of the general proportions of a Catskill Dry Fly, has been discussed. I'm pretty sure that the thread you are thinking about had to do with the 'first use of the phrase, 'Catskill Dry Fly'.
Still looking.
Allan
You may be very astute in your observation of Mary Dette's flies and your ability to glean measurements through the observation of the photos. However, although perhaps well intentioned, your conclusion does not answer the question because you're not citing a written reference. Also, you're assuming, "The photos are said to have been tied by Elsie herself", is factual. Not saying it's not and that they weren't. Just that a 'statement' is not a primary reference. Lastly, you're assuming that there's a set of proportions that "we grew up with". Many people, certainly more than me, have handled flies tyed by the 'masters'. I mean tyers of the Golden Era (say 1920-1960). The proportions of dry flies by those tyers varied somewhat but most certainly DO NOT fit the proportions you identify. I have personally measured the proportions of flies from the vault of the Catskill Fly Fishing Center and can attest the proportions used by them were significantly fifferent than what you report.
However, even my report, which I published years ago does not answer the question that I'll state again - What is the earliest reference of the proportion measurements of the Catskill dry fly?
Allan
It is worth noting that the article says that "...they were tied for Art Flick's book...". This begst he question of who actually tied them. As at least four of the listed flies were patterns of Flick's own origin, I doubt that he would turn to someone else to tie his own patterns for him for his own book; though I have no way to prove this. As he was a profound believer in the Grey Fox Variant, and tied large numbers of them for his own use, I would also venture that the picture of this fly is actually one of Flick's own ties. Again, just speculating.
Byron,
............."These flies are the property of Glenn C. Overton and were purchased by him from Elsie Darbee."
Again, that is not a primary source. It does identify that the flies were bought by someone from someone. Does not specify who tyed the flies. A hackle gauge is just that. It is a tool made by one individual for his specific purpose. It may or may not identify what is generally accepted in the community of fly tyers who tyed in that particular style. Example: Because Lee Wulff tyed w/o the use of a vise, that certainly does not mean that in order for a fly to be considered a 'Wulff' it must be tyed w/o a vise. The use of Dette's gauge was to aid him. If you had spoken to the Dettes or people who had, you'd know that each 'size' had an allowable deviation. It was a general measurement and often tails, hackle, wings deviated.
Still looking for documented evidence.
Allan
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote