+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: More evidence of how stocking sucks...

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default More evidence of how stocking sucks...

    http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/article.php?art_id=8756

    I
    realize that not all waters can support natural reproduction.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    West Tennessee
    Posts
    2,251

    Default

    As with most things the government does...
    Good fishing technique trumps all.....wish I had it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Palm Bay, Florida/Rock River Wyoming, USA
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Stocking is a necessity for several reasons including stocking waters that have had a fish kill, etc or otherwise decimated fish population. Additionally it's a superb tool for introducing a species where none lived before and the abundance of great Rainbow fisheries across the US, or the many farm ponds across the midwest, as evidence of that. Adding to that we have a huge number of fisheries across the US and elsewhere that are put and take fisheries and these would collapse without supplemental stocking. A huge stocking success is the trout fishery that exists today in the North Platte river and tributaries here in Wyoming and Colorado which was devoid of salmonids (trout) prior to the pioneers stocking them there. On the other hand, as the article points out, stocking is often used in situations that dictate otherwise. Stocked, Native, Wild and mixed fisheries all have their place and it often takes paying attention to nature that tells us which is best (humans being part of nature).
    Good Fishing,

    Chuck S (der Aulte Jaeger)

    "I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved"

    http://fishing-folks.blogspot.com/

  4. #4

    Default

    Well said Chuck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Liberty Lake, Washington
    Posts
    3,566

    Default

    I pretty much depend on put and take lakes for about 2 meals a month. We are actually having fried trout for dinner tonight. Stocking those lakes is a major source of revenue for licenses and sporting goods retailers. It does however, need to be done with a large measure of education.
    Where you go is less important than how you take the steps.
    Fish with a Friend,
    Lotech Joe


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    California's Central Valley
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Whether stocking is a positive or negative depends on where and how they are stocked. One positive: Stocking catchables next to the road discourages the bait anglers from walking a quarter mile to where there are more wild fish to be caught.

    Another: Stocking rainbow fry in the High Sierra means that lakes that have no feeder streams can still have a viable rainbow fishery. Actually, without original stocking, none of our alpine wilderness lakes would have trout of any kind, and wouldn't that be a shame?
    If you give a man a fish, he will have dinner. If you teach a man to fish, he will be late for dinner.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. TU chapter stocking
    By jmccall in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-03-2015, 04:12 PM
  2. Sometimes it sucks to be a fly fisherman
    By Prairieschooner in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-25-2012, 02:20 PM
  3. Kinda sucks
    By Terry Lightle in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-26-2010, 11:12 AM
  4. That sucks!!!!
    By Bass_Bug in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-13-2010, 06:37 AM
  5. Cost of stocking
    By in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-19-2006, 10:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts