+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Simms to sell felt soles boots again!

  1. #1

    Default Simms to sell felt soles boots again!

    Angling Trade has learned that Simms Fishing Products told its sales representatives, and is now informing dealers, that the company plans to reintroduce boots with felt soles in its 2012 product lineup. You may remember that just a couple years ago, Simms was the company that beat the drum loudest about going felt-free, and swore off production of felt-soled boots after 2010.
    As most of you know, felt has been associated with the spread of aquatic invasive species? nasty things like New Zealand mud snails, didymo (rock snot), as well as the parasite that causes whirling disease. In some states, the threats have been taken seriously enough that felt is no longer allowed. You can?t fish in felt in Maryland or Vermont, and starting next year, felt will be banned in Alaska.
    The science hasn?t changed, but neither did consumers? and dealers? attitudes toward wearing felt?there are still many felt stalwarts who contend there is no adequate substitute for traction in a river. And apparently, a good number of dealers claimed they had plenty of customers who could not be sold on felt alternatives.
    As such, Simms director of marketing and brand management Diane Bristol said that the company labored over the decision, but ultimately yielded to the demands of customers, specifically dealers, who said they needed felt in the arsenal.
    ?It?s ultimately about choices, and allowing customers to make their choices on boots with felt,? said Bristol. ?We didn?t take this decision lightly, but ultimately it came down to listening to what our customers wanted.?
    Which many will assume means it came down to a matter of money? not just for Simms, but also for dealers.
    Simms says it is not disengaging from the invasive species fight by any means. Plans are to reintroduce felt on only three boot models, and the company also intends to amp up efforts to inform consumers about the need to wade clean through additional literature and labeling.
    Still, Simms will get plenty of flak for the turnaround, and no doubt expects it. But keep in mind that other major boot makers like Orvis, Patagonia, and Korkers, kept right on chugging with felt production in recent years. So don?t expect any stones thrown from glass houses.
    Thus, the Simms turnabout is less of a head fake, and more a situation where Simms tried to lead the market across the avenue, then got caught alone in traffic when the lights changed.
    Hopefully, the industry as a whole, takes a harder closer look at the felt issue? not necessarily to regulate, rather to amp up efforts to inform the public about the effects of invasive species.
    In truth, aquatic nuisances can be transported in many boot materials, not just felt. In some ways, the notion that an angler got a ?free pass? from cleaning boots by buying models with rubber soles was as dangerous as it will be to allow responsible choices and encourage responsible care regarding felt.
    Now the choices are more open. It will be interesting to see where consumers, retailers, and manufacturers all go with them.

  2. #2

    Default

    Translation: "Our profit margin on wading boots has fallen since we got rid of felt soles, so we're bringing them back."

    "The sciense hasn't changed..." NO, no it hasn't. The "new" boots capture and transport invasive species just like felt boots will, just only in the upper part of the boot. If you don't clean/dry them properly like you should with ANY boot, they really aren't a whole lot better than felt wrt transporting invasive species, yet traction stinks compared to felt.

    Glad to see they finally got some common sense! (even if it took loos of profit to "see the light")
    "Engineers don't idle well."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CO_Flyfisher View Post
    "The sciense hasn't changed..." NO, no it hasn't. The "new" boots capture and transport invasive species just like felt boots will, just only in the upper part of the boot. If you don't clean/dry them properly like you should with ANY boot, they really aren't a whole lot better than felt wrt transporting invasive species, yet traction stinks compared to felt.
    Seems like the key to addressing the problem really centers on spending quality time on the unsexy task of cleaning our gear properly and regularly, and not just replacing it with lesser gear that still can perpetuate the problem, but makes us feel better about it.
    A right emblem it may be, of the uncertain things of this world; that when men have sold them selves for them, they vanish into smoke. ~ William Bradford
    I finally realized that Life is a metaphor for Fly Fishing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Rothschild (Wausau), Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    I think it is also a safety issue.

    If a manufacturer removes a safer product and replaces it with a product that is less safe and if their advertisements and representatives have said it is just as good (Simms has made this claim) for wading as the former product, I think it opens Simms up to law suits. It can either say it was wrong and rubber is NOT as safe as felt OR it can offer felt. If Simms instead offers felt, it has a weak defense in that it is the angler's choice as to what they buy.

    I wonder if the liability issue was considered. Orvis says that rubber is not as good as felt and Orvis does not even sell rubber soles WITHOUT studs.
    Regards,

    Silver

    "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought"..........Szent-Gyorgy

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Middle Tennessee
    Posts
    740

    Default

    So I guess Simms went to the School of Hard Knocks! sometimes it don't pay to get on the bandwagon with others. Getting involved with these groups or organization trying to banned felt soles has cost Simms a good chunk of profit over the last few years. Simms thought they could take advantages of the situation for their capital gains, well I guess not.
    Popperfly>-<(((((*>
    Born to Fish...Forced to Work !

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woodbine, MD
    Posts
    702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by popperfly View Post
    So I guess Simms went to the School of Hard Knocks! sometimes it don't pay to get on the bandwagon with others. Getting involved with these groups or organization trying to banned felt soles has cost Simms a good chunk of profit over the last few years. Simms thought they could take advantages of the situation for their capital gains, well I guess not.

    They just lost my business.
    Bob

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Elida, Ohio
    Posts
    1,696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    They just lost my business.

    They just got mine.

    Brad
    "A woman drove me to drink and I didn't even have the decency to thank her."
    -W.C. Fields

  8. Default

    How about someone doing some research on a product that we can use to clean all our gear? Oh well that's probably beyond the politicos & money mongers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    With respect to didymo, cleaning gear is fairly easy. Warm water with dish detergent works fine as the detergent kills the didymo cells. Also, drying out the boots and waders completely works too, since didymo dries out and dies. Salt water will kill it as well, so if your boots and waders can deal with salt water, you can put 'em in brine. The issue with felt is that it takes much much longer to dry out the felt sole then the rest of the gear (or get the soap into the sole, where the didymo can "hide"). If you go from one water shed to another in the same day, you can track it no matter what gear you're using on the laces, etc. If, however, you dry your boots out by the heater over night thinking you're doing your bit, then go to a new area the next day, sure your upper boot and waders are sanitised, but the inner parts of the felt sole may still be damp, etc.

    That, in a nut shell, is the guts of the argument for banning felt here in NZ. Even if you try and clean and dry your gear, felt just makes it too hard to do so.

    Now, the science behind all of the above is sound. Yes, didymo will live much longer in the sole of felt boots then it does on the other parts of the boots or waders. Where the concern is, however, is that the science they cite as the reason for banning felt soles is the "wrong" science. The science they need to conduct is "how much spread of didymo is a direct result of transfer by felt soled wading boots"? Rather than, say, tramper's boots, boats (canoes, kyacks, outboard motors, etc), vehicles, peoples pets, swimming gear, etc. If felt soles are a major player then great, but remember the above science doesn't address that issue, it only addresses whether or not didymo survives longer in the felt soles. It does not address the issue of whether or not this translates to a high incidence of didymo transfer. For that, you need to examine whether or not wet boots do often move from one water system to another. You would have to examine angler behaviour, since it is the angler that moves the boots. It may be that anglers tend to remain in a single water system, so even if their boots get "infected", they are not transfering didymo to a new area as they move around. When the typical angler shifts to a new water system, the time between fishing trips may generally be long enough that even the soles dry out sufficiently, therefore rendering transfer by the soles highly unlikely). Boats, however, may tend to retain water for much longer, increasing the liklihood (and volume) of contamination. Hikers are more likely to cover large distances, through moutain regions, and therefore may be more likly to track material to separate water systems (should we ban hiking boots?). And so forth. In other words, yes, banning felt does ban a potential carrier, but there is no evidence that felt soles were the major carrier, or even a highly probable carrier, compared to all the other potential carriers, which were not banned.

    Good science provides us with information. Misunderstanding what that information tells us is not the fault of the science. Unfortunately, deliberate misrepresentation of science is becomming more common in various forms of propoganda or by the press to sell more papers. Ironically, this leads to an increase in the mistrust of scientists rather than an increased mistrust in policy makers or reporters. Go figure.

    - Jeff
    Last edited by JeffHamm; 07-01-2011 at 12:47 AM.
    Am fear a chailleas a chanain caillidh e a shaoghal. -

    He who loses his language loses his world.

  10. #10

    Default

    Simms is doing nothing wrong in my opinion by bring back felt. I feel it is a safer way to wade over rubber soles. We anglers need to be responsible and do our part and clean them properly. This is no different then having alcohol or guns at our disposal for example. We can ban them or we can be responsible with their use. In my view responsibility is the way to go.
    Trout don't speak Latin.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Maryland may ban felt soles--
    By Old #art in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-23-2011, 11:07 PM
  2. Simms sneaker v/s Simms boots v/s Patagonia Marlwalker boots
    By Saltamontes in forum Saltwater Fly Fishing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 11:45 PM
  3. Replacing felt soles?
    By HCR in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-29-2009, 08:40 PM
  4. TU weighs in on felt soles!?!
    By flybinder in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 08:46 PM
  5. wading boots: felt soles or lug soles?
    By WoollyB in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-07-2005, 04:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts