+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: WF or DT ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Victoria , Tx
    Posts
    645

    Default WF or DT ?

    I know this is not a new question but there are alot of conflicting opinions on the subject of weight forword vs. double taper fly lines. I have always been a weight forward guy since I fish some larger warm water flies and have to contend with the south Texas winds. But I also fish some smaller flies at shorter distance and a good presentation is needed. Some say the double taper is the only way to go. What do you perfer and why?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    DFW metroplex, TX USA
    Posts
    1,164

    Default

    I think there is probably still a good article in the archives here by Leon Chandler, who was Cortland's ambassador to the fly fishing world. See if you can find it.

    The gist of it, as I recall, was that you will normally have no difference in your casts until you get to a distance where the weight forward's running line (the thin part) comes into play. I fish streams, so runnig line never comes into play for me. If I tried to fish at a distance where I was into my running line, I would not be able to get a good drift. So I buy DTs as they have the advantage of being able to be turned around on my reel when the first end gets worn out, thus doubling the effective life of my fly line.

    Many catalogs will show you the profile of the lines they offer. If the line profile looks about the same for WF and DT at the distances you cast, I think DT is your best bet.

  3. #3

    Default

    Weight Forward here. But they are the same at 30'... I cast farther than 30'..LOL
    I also know a lot of people that cut a DT in half and attach Amnesia so they get two lines...but, I prefer the thinner running line and like buy new line once in awhile. How else do you get to try out the new stuff.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    I prefer double taper. Never actually did a scientific comparison to settle the argument within my own mind, so my opinion is just that. An opinion with no real basis for its existence.

    Allan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    aimless wandering
    Posts
    2,042
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    Since I see no difference in how they cast, I prefer DT lines, so that when I wear out the business end, I can turn it around and fish it some more. I get twice as many fly lines as if I bought WFs.

  6. #6

    Default

    I do see a difference in how they cast. Big difference for me. I prefer the smaller diameter running line, plus all the specialty lines are WF. Windcutter, Grand, Bass taper, Trout taper....etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Western Washington
    Posts
    2,040
    Blog Entries
    27

    Default

    Almost all of my lines are Weight Forward, either a standard WF fly line or a heavier WF nymphing line, plus some bass lines and spey lines, shooting head lines, sink tip lines, etc.

    I do use a double taper line on my dry fly rod. I most likely don't have to but in theory you get a better presentation for a dry fly with a double taper. Naturally, a lot of the presentation is determined on how I cast and I am not an expert caster, so like I said, it most likely doesn't make a difference, but why not go with the double taper for dries.

    Larry ---sagefisher---

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sagefisher View Post
    Almost all of my lines are Weight Forward, either a standard WF fly line or a heavier WF nymphing line, plus some bass lines and spey lines, shooting head lines, sink tip lines, etc.

    I do use a double taper line on my dry fly rod. I most likely don't have to but in theory you get a better presentation for a dry fly with a double taper. Naturally, a lot of the presentation is determined on how I cast and I am not an expert caster, so like I said, it most likely doesn't make a difference, but why not go with the double taper for dries.

    Larry ---sagefisher---
    I would love to go fishing and do so with just dries. Sadly, on every outing I do end up adding a nymph at one point or another.

  9. #9

    Default

    Out to 40 feet or so I find very little, if any, difference. 40 to 90 feet (pretty much my limit), WF is an absolute advantage. especially in shooting line. Some extreme distance casters like DT because they use the entire line as a shooting head. I have never seen this but I have heard it can be done. Only my small stream 4 and 3 wt have DT. I really don't know why brcause I usually just buy a new line rather than switch ends. A new gizmo or a differend color, maybe. Maybe tradition too, I guess.

    Bob

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Pacific
    Posts
    1,351

    Default

    Bruce Richards, who knows a bit about fly lines, wrote the following two articles:

    www.flyanglersonline.com/begin/101/dtvswf.php

    www.danblanton.com/WFvsDT.html


    Most of the line Manufactures publish the technical details and measurements of their line tapers on their websites and/or print catalogs. If you look up this material you will find that the front 30 to 40 of basic WF and DT lines are often the same, in which cases there is no difference in performance until you get into the back taper of the WF line.

    Now there are many specialty tapers available that it is difficult to make a blanket statement that a WF or DT is better for presentation. For instance some DT lines have a longer front taper for more delicate presentations. But some WF lines do too. In my fishing I really haven't found there to be a significant difference, the ability to make a good cast having a greater impact on presentation.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts