+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Anyone considering torque when twisting leader legs?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    7

    Default Anyone considering torque when twisting leader legs?

    I'm very new to this forum and I'm starting a new thread because I just couldn't find where there has been consideration of torque when twisting the two separate leader legs. Here is a thought and I'd really like some opinion before I try this. Seems there is a generally accepted standard as to 10% length reduction and then testing by twisting to the breaking point of the material being used. What if the twisting was done with a small power screwdriver that has a built in torque clutch. Mine is a Milwaukee model 0490-20 in 4 volts. It has a clutch setting that ranges from 1 to 21 with 21 being lockup for drilling. According to the operator manual, the #1 clutch setting will shut the screwdriver off when 3.3 inch-pounds of torque is reached. Now this is a screwdriver and not a drill so the clutch settings are much lower than on a drill. The higher you make the setting, the higher you set the the screwdriver shutoff. Therefore, the screwdriver shutoff can be incrementally set in steps ranging from 3.3 to just over 21 or 22 inch-pounds. So here is how I see this working. I twist the leader leg down to the 10% mark. At that point I have a stopper or barrier of some kind to keep the screwdriver from being pulled any closer to the holding peg. Then I keep twisting until I reach my preset torque level. After all, isn't it the torque stored energy that causes the two legs to furl?

  2. #2

    Default

    When will breakage occur?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducksterman View Post
    When will breakage occur?
    That I don't know yet. However, other posts would seem to indicate that you can pretty well see when the twist is tight enough so maybe I will not have to experiment too much. Ducksterman, you are an old hand on this forum. Do you recall anyone approaching the twisting of the legs from the torque perspective?

  4. #4

    Default

    I do not DD. At least what you are thinking of. It will be interesting to see what others have to say.

    You said..."Seems there is a generally accepted standard as to 10% length reduction and then testing by twisting to the breaking point of the material being used"

    I'm not sure that is an accurate statement.

    It's all about tension... it can be applied a number of ways. Let's use the hand held powwer as the example as I believe that's what you are talking about. BTW I know someone who can get up to 17% reduction doing hand held power and applying the correct tension. 10% is an easy target and puts out a nice leader.
    But what the folks are doing is applying what is felt to be adequate tension while twisting up to 10% reduction and stopping.... during that twisting the energy is being stored . They have applied enough tension that they are close to the breaking point without pigtailing at 10%.

    I think you might consider this. Use your torque idea to determine the breaking point of a given material and leader formula and then set future torque so as not to allow breakage before you got to your desired reduction.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Berea, Ohio
    Posts
    540

    Default

    In mechanical engineering (unlike physics), the terms "torque" and "moment" are not interchangeable. "Moment" is the general term for the tendency of one or more applied forces to rotate an object about an axis (the concept which in physics is called torque).[3] "Torque" is a special case of this: If the applied force vectors add to zero (i.e., their "resultant" is zero), then the forces are called a "couple" and their moment is called a "torque".[3]
    For example, a rotational force down a shaft, such as a turning screw-driver, forms a couple, so the resulting moment is called a "torque". By contrast, a lateral force on a beam produces a moment (called a bending moment), but since the net force is nonzero, this bending moment is not called a "torque".
    This article follows physics terminology by calling all moments by the term "torque", whether or not they are associated with a couple.

    Thought I'd clear things up.......
    "Rivers and the inhabitants of the watery elements are made for wise men to contemplate and for fools to pass by without consideration"
    "Izaac Walton"
    Member of NBOF
    Life Member FFF
    Member Ohio Council FFF

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,545

    Default

    There were a "couple" "moments" in my life when I did get "torqued"! : )

    I twist both legs to the 10% and allow the leader to furl and the leader works great so I see no reason to twist them any further than the 10%. I am not sure what you would gain from twisting beyond 10%. I would think one could twist too far and the leader would kink up "big time" when you do an steady pull to free up a snagged fly and it either breaks off or comes lose. Just a thought with nothing to back it up except "horse sense".

    Interesting question.....
    Warren
    Fly fishing and fly tying are two things that I do, and when I am doing them, they are the only 2 things I think about. They clear my mind.

  7. #7

    Default

    In the proposed method of twisting until 10% and then twisting more until the torque setting of the screwdriver is reached i think you'll end up with a shorter leader then you expected. All the "extra" stored energy will be used to furl the legs, so they'll get shorter.
    As for the 10%, that's about the best you can get with nylon monofilament with some safety margin. For polyester thread (guetermann tera 180) it's possible to get about 30% reduction. This leader is stiffer and gives some trouble putting shorb loops in it, so i'm thinking of settling for 20-25% with this material. Don't know yet what is possible with fluorocarbon.

    Karel

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Maine, Now I've retired to North Carolina (just south of Fayetteville)
    Posts
    573

    Default

    Warren P;

    Thanks for clearing that up. Ohiofly had me "DEEP" in thought. lol lol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Well this has been an interesting journey in the search of the mechanics for making furled leaders. I will not go into the wealth of scientific literature that I found only because I recognize that I would lose almost all readers and that is not my intent. Here, in a nutshell, is what I’ve found.


    When we twist the fiber strands of each separate leg of the leader, we are creating stored energy in a bundle of fibers. When we twist too hard during this phase, for the amount of pull that we are applying on the long axis of the leg, the twisted bundle tries to untwist and that is what happens when we get a “Pig Tail”. My European and English cousins will probably appreciate more readily that this twisting of a number of strands into a bundle to store energy was used centuries ago in siege engines, such as the giant crossbows (Ballista) that used two bundles or the medieval catapult (Onager) powered by a single bundle of twisted ropes.


    There are all kinds of calculations that can be generated using the form and function of a helix for bundles but I will not do that. Let us just say that the stored energy in each leg stays there until we either make a mistake and our leg untwists or we place the two legs side by side and then release the stored energy. When we control the release, the two legs will each untwist providing the energy to twist the two legs together known as the furling phase in making the leader. Using Kathy Scott’s method, you anchor one end of the leader and apply a weight to the other end to keep the leader from pig tailing. She notes and many of us have experienced that the total leader then twists one way and then the other for some time. Once that twisting has subsided, the control weight is reduced to just the weight of the S-hook. When the leader finally stops twisting, it has then reached a point of equilibrium where the stored twisting in each leg and the furling twist counterbalance each other. Now I ascribe to Kathy’s idea of letting gravity do the furling for me but I know many use power furling. You just would have to be careful and not over furl which would create more stored energy but in the opposite twist.


    So, I think I have answered my own question. I can apply torque, that numerous engineering documents recognize as a mechanical term, which twists the fiber bundles in the two legs of my leader. I then can either use some longitudinal controlling force to allow the leg to shorten to, say 10%, of its original length OR I can twist the bundle down to a predetermined length and then stop the shortening and continue to twist until I reach a desired inch-pounds of applied torque. I would suggest that the second process would result in a more consistent stored energy given the same leader material over replications in leaders.


    Again, I would appreciate any comments or corrections that anyone might have.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DocDug View Post
    OR I can twist the bundle down to a predetermined length and then stop the shortening and continue to twist until I reach a desired inch-pounds of applied torque. I would suggest that the second process would result in a more consistent stored energy given the same leader material over replications in leaders.


    Again, I would appreciate any comments or corrections that anyone might have.
    As the extra stored energy will cause the leader to shorten more(the first time you won't know how much), i'd go for determining the length of a testleader using your method to find the % of reduction you got and use this percentage to calculate the untwisted length you'll need for future leaders. Suppose this percentage will be different for different materials.

    Karel

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Hackle twisting
    By melk in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-13-2013, 11:48 PM
  2. Dry fly hackle twisting
    By stcroixguy in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-11-2013, 11:34 PM
  3. Basic Question on twisting
    By ducksterman in forum Furling
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 08:32 PM
  4. How is a furled leader different from a braided leader?
    By JAd in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-10-2006, 10:30 PM
  5. Problems with hackle twisting when palmering
    By anglerdave in forum Fly Tying
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-09-2006, 11:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts