This is a very interesting and divisive topic.

As a confirmed blueliner in my area, i am definitely partial to native fish anywhere they are found. That said, in the stream in question, I'd tend to favor the brookie.

This in mind, I'm still opposed to this 'witch hunt' style of shoot-from-the-hip wildlife management, mainly because of the image it projects, and its obviously politically-charged inception. Rather, I'd prefer to see more of an educational campaign, explaining the reasoning as to why the local TU supports the harvest of the browns. In small streams, browns often out-compete resident populations of native brookies, and only on the smallest of streams (where the environment itself tends to prevent the browns from growing much larger (and by extension more voracious) than the brookies) have I ever seen the two species co-existing in a stable, naturally self-supporting balance.

So...I guess to summarize: no, I don't oppose this effort...but I dont support it either.