+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: World Class Susquehanna River In Danger!!

  1. #1
    nighthawk Guest

    Default World Class Susquehanna River In Danger!!

    While getting my car fixed today I read the following article in the Patriot-News:

    What's killing our fish?
    Experts fear a 'perfect storm' of factors
    Tuesday, October 11, 2005
    BY BRETT LIEBERMAN
    Of Our Washington Bureau

    WASHINGTON - The thousands of smallmouth bass that died this summer in central Pennsylvania rivers might be part of a broader national problem that's being spurred by pollution, climate change and even hormones such as birth control pills taken by humans.

    Researchers, environmentalists, and fish and wildlife experts worry that these environmental effects are creating a "perfect storm" that is beginning to cripple aquatic ecosystems and could be a warning of looming problems for all species.

    "We started covering this because scientists working on specific fish kills kept referring to a strange new problem sweeping the country," said Jay Gourley, the vice president of the nonprofit Public Education Center, which tracks environmental issues and is calling attention to the spreading problem.The group has documented cases from California to New York that are similar to the one that left thousands of bass floating in the Susquehanna River in July.

    "They were frantic to explain how various harmful factors, not necessarily catastrophic by themselves, were combining into one perfect storm after another and wiping out aquatic ecosystems at a frightening pace," Gourley said.

    Low water flows, higher water temperatures, low oxygen levels in the water and lesions on thousands of smallmouth bass contributed to the fish kill in the Susquehanna and Juniata rivers from Sunbury to south of Harrisburg. But fish and environmental experts said they appear to be only part of the cause of July's kill.

    "I think a lot of our river systems are seeing multiple stresses that are affecting fish species," said Betsy Otto, a senior director of river advocacy for American Rivers, which named the Susquehanna the nation's most endangered river this year.

    "This is becoming a more widespread problem, and it's likely to become worse," she said.

    "At this point, there's not any science to say we know what caused this," said Paul O. Swartz, the executive director of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. "It's really circumstantial evidence, and it's really tough to understand."What's killing our fish?
    Page 2 of 3

    Combination of stressors:

    The river commission is assisting the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission and other agencies investigating large and unexplained fish kills in the lower Susquehanna and at least 20 other bodies of water.

    Low water levels contributed to warmer water temperatures, and a lack of grasses on the river bottom meant less oxygen was being produced. The warmer temperatures led to higher levels of bacteria, including columnaris, a common bacterium that usually does not affect fish.Those factors alone likely did not cause the fish kill but probably weakened their ability to fight the bacteria.

    "The fish were stressed and immunosuppressed, and they would probably be susceptible to a variety of opportunistic pathogens," said Vicki Blazer, a fish pathologist for the U.S. Geological Survey who has been investigating unexplained and large fish kills on the Shenandoah and Potomac rivers.

    "You're dealing with a multitude of things that are not, in and of themselves, enough to cause death, but they push animals beyond their physiological limits," USGS immunologist Chris Ottinger said in a statement.

    Many fish are dying from diseases that are not normally fatal, said Ottinger, who is studying an epidemic of fish tuberculosis downstream from the Susquehanna in the Chesapeake Bay.

    'A scary decline':

    Studying similar fish kills in the Shenandoah and Potomac, Blazer found microscopic evidence of intersex, the exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals that lead male fish to grow eggs.

    She said the change demonstrates the impact of slow exposure to estrogenic compounds found in agricultural runoff and human waste downstream from sewage treatment plants.European countries have been studying the impact of synthetic hormones frequently used by humans for hormone-replacement treatment or birth control and then excreted. Researchers in the United States are just beginning to investigate their effects.

    "These particular type of chemicals work at such low levels," Blazer said.

    Dan Tredinnick, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, said researchers are plowing through mounds of data without answers."There isn't any one single piece of data or one single thing that leaps out," he said, adding, "We have been in contact with fellow state agencies trying to pick their brains."

    The only completed research is an analysis of smallmouth bass birth rates during the past 18 years that shows many young fish last spring.

    Large numbers of "young of the year" might be a good indicator of the species' future health, though several area anglers said the number of fish caught has dropped sharply during the past 20 years.

    "The overall population of most of the fish are way down," said Bob Clouser of Middletown, a fisherman and river guide.

    Clouser used to be able to take two experienced anglers out for a day on the Susquehanna and expect to catch about 50 fish each. Now they're lucky to catch eight.

    "It's a scary decline," he said, adding that he's watched as water snakes, bull frogs and then other species have disappeared. "I don't know what it's all related to, but I assume it's some sort of pollution."

    Clouser is sure of one thing: that the Susquehanna's waters have grown heavier and darker than when he started fishing on its banks.

    BRETT LIEBERMAN: (202) 383-7833 or blieberman@patriot-news.com

    FISH KILLS

    Recent large fish kills that fit the "perfect storm" pattern. Source: The Public Education Center

    # JULY, Susquehanna and Juniata rivers: Many smallmouth bass, from Sunbury to south of Harrisburg, died in a kill attributed to an outbreak of a bacterial infection, columnaris. The cause of the outbreak is unknown.

    # 2005, Chesapeake Bay: As many as 70 percent of bay rockfish are infected with mycobacteriosis, or "fish tuberculosis." The number has risen from 11 percent in 1997. Many scientists attribute the increase to a "perfect storm" of poor nutrition, excess nitrogen, warm temperatures and low oxygen.

    # 2005, Shenandoah River, south fork and main, Va.: An estimated 80 percent of smallmouth bass died, and bacterial lesions were classified as a "secondary" effect caused by an unknown stressor.

    # 1999-2005, Long Island Sound, N.Y.: In the past three years, about 95 percent of the basin's lobster stock has died. Lobsters in the eastern sound have been suffering from "shell disease," a bacterial infection that has greatly increased in recent years. Scientists say a "perfect storm" that caused a population crash in 1999 has not abated.

    Previous | 1 | 2 | 3

    Print This E-mail This
    MORE NEWS

    ? Board rift puts slots licensing off track

    ? What's killing our fish?

    ? Bridge restriction delays fire truck
    ? More Stories
    ? 2005 The Patriot-News. Used with permission.


    My personal observation is that for the last several years the small mouth fishing on the Susquhanna has been very poor. Now we are being told what many of us knew all along. This world class fishery is in danger. In front of my house there is a two mile stretch from launch ramp to launch ramp. When I started fishing this stretch 10 years back it wasn't uncommon to catch 20-30 fish most over 20" in length. Now you are lucky to catch 3 or more fish period. I have stopped fishing the Susquehanna this year because the fish don't need me adding to their stress levels. I have noted many fish floating along the shore. All of the watershed states for this river are going to have to join together to solve this problem before it's too late. Even the walleye fishers are complaining about the poor fishing.

    ------------------
    Eric "nighthawk"

    It's a great day for fly fishing!

    [This message has been edited by nighthawk (edited 11 October 2005).]

    [This message has been edited by nighthawk (edited 11 October 2005).]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North East, MD
    Posts
    283

    Default

    Well, the PA governor has already told the state of MD that he has no funds to work on the Susquehanna watershed! Harrisburg's sewage system is failing and sewage is moving into the river. Development has reached an astonomical level.

    The Susky was named the most "at risk river" in the US in the spring of 2005.

  3. #3
    nighthawk Guest

    Default

    SW Ladyfish,
    That is one of the big reasons I didn't vote for the current governor. His stand on the environment is terrible as is that of the general assembly. The difference in the clarity of the water between Harrisburg and points north is real but lets not forget that all of the Susquhanna states pollute the river with agricultural run off and raw sewage. Not just Pennsylvania. It's time for us as fishers to send a loud and clear message to all of the state governments that we want the problems solved. We need to do the same for the Delaware water shed as well. If we don't force our states and perhaps the federal government to take action then we can forget about a rescue for these rivers. As I said many of us have known all along that the river is in trouble but trying to get fishers to present a united front is like pulling teeth. I am as guilty of that as the next person. If I can change, and I will, we all can change.

    P.S.
    There are funds available under our "Growing Greener" peoject to local communities. I know several of the folks from the Duncannon, Pa. area that helped use their portion of the funds on the Susquehanna River. It's just one effort but they did a good job with what they had.

    ------------------
    Eric "nighthawk"

    It's a great day for fly fishing!

    [This message has been edited by nighthawk (edited 11 October 2005).]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Damascus,Maryland USA
    Posts
    312

    Default

    Hi,
    Our area first became aware of this same problem when the fish kills in the W.Va portions of the Potomac showed signs and symptoms of the sores/lesions as well. The problem is now showing up further south in the Williamsport area of the upper Potomac. I just hope that the problem can be corrected before it wipes out the entire fishery. The Potomac is a very deep, strong and mighty river that begins its journey in WVa and flows all the way to the Chesapeake Bay.
    The Susquehanna also flows to the bay but not sure if the Juniata joins the Sussquehanna on the way to the Bay.It would be a major disaster if these problems were to affect the bay. It is a disaster that is already affecting the Rivers already named but did not know about waters in the mid or western states.

  5. #5
    nighthawk Guest

    Default

    Gerri,
    The Juniata joins the Susquehanna at Duncannon, Pa. just north of Harrisburg.

    ------------------
    Eric "nighthawk"

    It's a great day for fly fishing!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Severn, MD, US
    Posts
    125

    Default

    [url=http://www.wtop.com/?sid=521199&nid=443:3e08c]http://www.wtop.com/?sid=521199&nid=443[/url:3e08c]
    This is a very good series of articles from the DC talk radio station called "Troubled Waters."
    They are now doing a "Troubled Waters II" as the dead zone in the middle of the bay is larger than its ever been.
    Frank Reid

  7. #7
    nighthawk Guest

    Default

    Thank you, Frank. That is some interesting stuff. I know that the impact of upstream pollution has had a terrible effect on the bay. Makes me sick. The crabbing in the bay has really gone down hill along with other fishing. If we can clean up the Potomac and Susquehanna that would help the bay in a very big way. The Chesapeake bay is very beautiful and needs attention fast. To destroy these waters is wrong to say the least

    ------------------
    Eric "nighthawk"

    It's a great day for fly fishing!

  8. #8
    Guest

    Default

    I know from my own personal history with the Susquehanna, that it was a very polluted river in the 60's. All town's dumped their raw sewage into the river. I remember fishing over at the sh#t plant on the West Side of Steelton and seeing turds floating out to thr river. And the Susquehanna has always had episodes of low water. I remember walking across the Susquehanna down at the East End of Steelton. All we used to catch were catfish and carp and occassionally someone would catch a smallmouth. I was under the impression that the Susquehanna has been cleaned up since the days of my youth. I was a Steelton river rat growing up so I know that river as well as anybody , at least in Steelton.

  9. #9

    Default

    SW Ladyfish:Well, the PA governor has already told the state of MD that he has no funds to work on the Susquehanna watershed!
    Yea but the schmuck has plenty of $$$ to get his fat butt to Philly every Sunday to do his Eagles commentary on TV.

    Ed Rendell-Governor of Philadelphia

  10. #10
    nighthawk Guest

    Default

    From the 1970's to the early 1990's the Susquehanna made a good recovery. Budget cuts and increasing population since the mid 1990's have damaged the river again. There was a strong effort to clean up acid run off from mines but it seems even that has been stopped. There is a host of other things that have damaged the river as well. Acid run off from mines is a very big problem through out the entire state of Pa. It has ruined many good trout streams that I fished as a teenager. Another concern for the Susquehanna is the problem with heavy metals and chemical pollution. The local fish warden tells us not to eat any bottom feeders. They are contaminated with mercury, pcb's and chlordane. It's shocking to read the rules digest that comes with your license and see how many waters are under do not eat advisories and no kill zones. The Ohio water shed is just as bad if not worse.

    Bamboozle, I agree. He is always on time for the games because he gets a state trooper to drive his limo over 100mph on the turnpike. Let you and I do that and see what we get for it.

    ------------------
    Eric "nighthawk"

    It's a great day for fly fishing!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Changing retrieve on Fenwick World Class 78D
    By Rybar in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-12-2012, 06:12 AM
  2. Susquehanna River Water Gap
    By nighthawk in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 12:20 AM
  3. Susquehanna River (PA.) smallmouth
    By ET custom flyrods in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-15-2009, 07:49 PM
  4. Susquehanna River Problems?
    By Maxwell in forum Warm water Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 01:58 PM
  5. Susquehanna River Problem?
    By Maxwell in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-24-2008, 10:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts