+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: New SA Sharkskin line

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, ks
    Posts
    1,361

    Default New SA Sharkskin line

    Has anyone out there cast the new Sharkskin line from Scientific Anglers? What did you think? I'm not interestested in the usual "is it worth the price tag" discussion. What I want to know is simply how do you think it compares to the line you are currently using. Any thing you don't like about it? I just cast it yesterday and have my opinions. I thought it would be helpful to see what the rest of you thought. All opinions are valid and appreciated.

    Thanks
    If it swims and eats, it'll eat a fly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Poulsbo, Washington State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,387

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    Ya, I have written several things about it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    kansas city,mo.
    Posts
    417

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    bluegill, i have not cast this line, but am interested in hearing your opinion of it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Carmel, ME USA
    Posts
    3,685

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    I had a chance to try the line at the Idaho Fish-In, thanks to Mister Castwell (AKA Superman). The line shoots well, adding about 30 feet to my casting distance. My wife cast the line and added about 20 feet to her casting distance. We liked the line well enough that we bought 2 of them for our Sage SLT 5 wgt's. At almost $100 a line, that's a ton of liking.

    REE
    Happiness is wading boots that never have a chance to dry out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Oregon Coast(Outside of Seaside/Astoria)
    Posts
    2,236

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    After casting and fishing, both, the Shark Skin and the AirFlo "Ridge Line", I personally prefer the Ridge Line.

    Mainly, for me anyway, the Ridge Line casts as well as the S.S. and at the same distances. But, since I'd say 99% of my yearly "fish take" is withing 60 feet, or less, of where I'm standing in the stream, "distance" isn't really a big thing to me.

    I also like the way the Ridge Line is more or less, "self cleaning", in the way it's designed. It appears, that the lateral cut "groves" in the Ridge Line, "flex the line" enough to throw off a great deal of stream and/or, lake debris that build up after a day's fishing. I found the Shark Skin was pretty dirty, (more, like my conventional fly lines become), after a few 8 hour days on the water.

    If "distance" is your thing, then maybe too, you can tolerate the "singing" that the S.S. puts out when whistling through the guides. The Ridge Line is very quiet. (But, again, that's only MY OWN preference on fly lines!)

    It doesn't matter, all that much to me personally, when choosing my fly gear, but of course, the price may play a part for some fly fishers, too......... nearly $100.00 for the S.S. and only $56.00 for the Ridge Line.
    (In fact, right now, Madison River has the Ridge Lines on sale for less than $40.00, including freight)
    Saint Paul-"The Highly Confused"
    You cannot do a kindness too soon, for you never know how soon it will be too late.
    -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Lawrence, KS, USA
    Posts
    416

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    I, too, test-casted Scientific Angler's Shark Skin at the Idaho Fish-In. I liked it a lot.

    I haven't yet tried throwing the Ridge Line that "flybinder" refers to, but doubtless it's a good line, too.

    What impressed me about the Sharkskin was not only how easily it shot through the rod guides but also how easily it slipped through my left hand while that hand was paying out line during false casting.

    If I regularly fished at places where long distance throws are required for ensuring a fighting chance at success, the Shark Skin line would definitely be on my reel. Or the Ridge Line -- which, again, is a line I haven't heard of before and haven't test-throwed yet.


    Joe
    "Better small than not at all."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Stamford, CT,USA
    Posts
    339

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    I got a Demo Shark Skin to try out a couple days before leaving for the ID Fish-In. I compared it to other lines during the first 2 days and then finished out the week using the shark.

    - Best casting fly line I ever used on fast action rods.

    - Comes off the water easier than other lines as it floats higher

    - Rough surface picks up more debris and needs more cleaning than other lines.

    - Clearly a step improvement in distance; adding 20ft+ to my distance cast on a 6WT Sage XP

    I bought 2 more upon returning home.
    Max

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Poulsbo, Washington State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,387

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    "ANY" fly line that extends a cast by feet or yards will present at near or moderate distances with less effort. Often those who denigrate long distance casts are those who can not perform them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Oregon Coast(Outside of Seaside/Astoria)
    Posts
    2,236

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    Ron E.E. & Max:
    Which color, of the Shark Skin did you buy? ("Sharktruese" or "Blue Heron")
    I like the looks of the Blue Heron shade, especially since these lines supposedly have a "flat-no glare" finish to them, but I wonder how hard it'd be to see/follow, on moving water!?
    (I used a Mastery blue/gray floater years ago and as soon as it hit the water, it virtually became invisible. Thus, the question on the Blue Heron color!)
    Saint Paul-"The Highly Confused"
    You cannot do a kindness too soon, for you never know how soon it will be too late.
    -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Carmel, ME USA
    Posts
    3,685

    Default Re: New SA Sharkskin line

    Flybinder,

    I have the Blue Heron color on both lines. Visibility depends on the glare on the water. I've been able to see the line quite well, except when the sun is low and directly in my face. I don't think any line would be easy to follow then.

    REE
    Happiness is wading boots that never have a chance to dry out.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. TFO, Litespeed, Nymph line, Windcutter Spey and Sharkskin
    By InTheDrift in forum Things For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 11:52 AM
  2. sci angler Sharkskin shooting line
    By flywriter in forum Saltwater Fly Fishing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2010, 12:11 AM
  3. WTB 8 Wt Sharkskin WF-F
    By K3's in forum Things Wanted
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-21-2009, 06:36 PM
  4. Sharkskin
    By steelieslayer in forum Sound Off
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-13-2008, 10:39 PM
  5. Sharkskin relief?
    By Lew in forum Fly Anglers Online
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 12:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts