Smallie wannabees

Meet Super Trout
Researchers at MU are building fish that are lean, mean fighting machines ? thanks to a little boost from creatine

By BRENT FRAZEE
The Kansas City Star

Imagine going to your favorite trout stream and being able to tangle with a ?super fish? ? a muscle-bound rainbow that has amazing strength and endurance.

Now imagine how that fish got that way ? by taking creatine, the same performance-enhancing supplement Mark McGwire used on the way to breaking baseball?s then-single-season home-run record in 1998. A far-fetched scenario, you say? Not in the eyes of researchers at the University of Missouri.

For more than a year, MU professors have been experimenting with feeding rainbow trout a diet supplemented with 5 percent creatine, which is used by athletes to increase muscle mass and endurance and recover more quickly from injuries.

The results have been striking. Preliminary findings indicated that some of the trout taking the creatine ? a naturally occurring amino acid, not a steroid or a hormone ? showed a five-fold increase in their stamina, measured by the length of time they were able to swim against a controlled current.

The day when that might translate to better fishing is still a long way off. The federal government does not approve creatine in fish that are to be consumed by humans, though the substance is legally sold over the counter as a supplement.

But researchers haven?t ruled out the possibility that the substance ? if proved safe, effective and economically feasible ? might one day change the face of fishing for some species.

?There would be a lot of marketability for harder-fighting fish,? said Rob Hayward, a fisheries professor at MU who is involved in the study. ?Fishermen probably would pay a premium for a chance of catching fish that fought longer and harder.

?Fee-fishing operations could market that they had harder-fighting fish, and they could gain some business.?

Alicia Amyx, part of the family that has operated the Rainbow Trout Ranch fee-fishing operation near Rockbridge, Mo., since 1954, agreed that it could present new possibilities.

?I?m sure it would be attractive to some of our fishermen, having harder-fighting trout,? she said. ?Trout 2 pounds and up fight hard enough. We hear a lot of stories about the one that got away. To have a trout that fought even harder could be exciting.

?But before we even considered using something like creatine, we would have to make sure it was safe (to consume) on a long-term basis. We?re careful that our fish are natural and of high quality. We wouldn?t want to jeopardize that in any way.?

But the gains wouldn?t necessarily be confined to freshwater fish. The benefits of creatine also could extend to saltwater fish, Hayward said.

?The big thing now is open-ocean aquaculture, in which fish are raised in large cages as far as 200 miles off shore,? Hayward said. ?By supplementing the diet of those fish with creatine, they might grow stronger and be able to withstand stronger currents.?

Hayward emphasizes that the study is still in its preliminary stages. But early returns have opened some eyes.

Creatine was first used by MU researchers in research with pigs to see whether it could improve the quality of pork.

Hayward and animal-sciences professor Eric Berg later decided to test the substance to see whether it could improve muscle growth in fish.

To test the fish?s swimming stamina, they used a Plexiglas swim tube in which the current could be regulated.

?In effect, it?s like a treadmill,? Hayward said. ?We can adjust the flow rate and see how the fish react.?

Hayward and Berg, aided by undergraduate researchers Amber Wiewel and Kyle Winders, also tested creatine?s effects on bluegills, but the results were not profound.

?Bluegills are relatively sedentary and are reluctant to swim, so differences weren?t pronounced,? Hayward said.

But the researchers found good subjects in the trout, which are current-oriented fish. Now they are thinking of testing other species, including the closely related salmon.

?We can?t say if this will ever have any application to fishing or aquaculture,? Hayward said. ?We are just providing the science.

?But it does provide some interesting possibilities.?

Hold the creatine. I'll take mine like they
come. It scares me when science starts
playing with "improving" species. I'm pretty happy with the way fish are now.*G*
Warm regards, Jim

I wonder what it would take to get the researchers to take the money and time they are using and use it to find a cure for cancer, diabetes and other diseases in this world instead of trying to re-create a fish that is just fine the way it is?!

------------------
Warren

I'd like to be the first to welcome our new super-trout overlords...oh wait, they're not here yet. whew!

I break off too many trout already. The last thing they need is more muscle or more advantage!


http://www.flyanglersonline.com/bb/icons/icon7.gif

Super ocean going bluegills! I knew it. I think I have seen two, broke me off on the hit!

I LIKE artificial flies. I do NOT like artificial fish.
Reminds one of those pen-raised, snot filled, obese mutant trouts they turn loose in S. Cal. reservoirs, catch with "crave" bait, and try to submit for record status.
Yep, more steroids please....
....lee s.

At what point does a dream become so corruppted that it has nothing of value to offer? There are so many things that seem like a good idea when you think them up, but relentless pursuit of a bad idea can be a bad thing. Fishing is about getting away from everyday convienences and getting back to something untouched. I wonder how long before we strap rockets to the superfishes backs and make them little submarines(LOL). Science should leave the fish alone and find better uses of its time.