Accidental Dun....Yarn Wing Dun revisited

I tied one of Gary Borger's "Yarn Wing Duns" in a post recently.
Last night, I was reading his book "Fishing the Film" (2012). In it, he mentions that he has modified his original version.

The biggest modification is that he bends the front of the shank upward, about 1/3 of the way back from the eye. This: 1. Causes the wing to position better; 2. Rides more like a natural.

The other feature about this pattern is that he uses the "X" style hackling to be more like the natural's legs.....


Anyway, I used Zelon which does't trim as neatly as yarn, but I like the glistening effect and I did not bend the hook in quite as severe an upward angle as Borger suggests.

Some pictures of the insect on the water.


http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...ps33ec386f.jpg


http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...psadec06df.jpg



http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...ps5f485685.jpg

http://www.flyanglersonline.com/flyt...w2/pitafly.jpg


The P.I.T.A. 'March Brown' - I have been tying this 'style' fly, in different patterns, probably since the early 1980s. This particular pattern was a FOTW in the 2nd Q, 2004. It was a topic of a thread back in late 2004 on this very site. An excellent tier, Paul Weamer, ties a similar style called the 'TruForm' and he's probably been tying it since about 2000.

You use an MP vise?

Under thorax para?

As mentioned in the other post, Borger started tying these in 1982, "sans" the bent hook. He does not mention when he began bending the hook.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byron haugh

You use an MP vise?

Under thorax para?

As mentioned in the other post, Borger started tying these in 1982, "sans" the bent hook. He does not mention when he began bending the hook.....

---

1. No
2. Parachute is on the underside of the hook.
3. Nothing in other post mentions that Borger, "started tying these in 1982".
Also, I originally bent a Mustad model 94831 hook. Then some manufacturers came out with bent hooks. Daiichi and Partridge for example.

What vise is pictured in the FAOL FOTW referred to?

I asked if it was "under thorax para".......that would be underside of the hook?

My original post that I was referring to with the date of 1982:
http://www.flyanglersonline.com/bb/s...ental-quot-Dun

I had sent this fly, in several of the various stages of tying, to the site with the narrative for each. The photographer placed each stage into his/her own vise to make the photo.
As for the 'initial post', I thought you were talking about the 1st post on this thread, not another one.

Certainly looks like an MP vise to me. Who did the photo?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byron haugh

Certainly looks like an MP vise to me. Who did the photo?

---

???? You'll have to ask the site and find out who did photography in 2004. JC perhaps?

I've tied the Weamer version, the fish like them and eat it well. I don't like them because I have had difficulty landing fish on that bent hook. For that reason I stopped tying them. Suspect the Borger version would have the same issue's. If I were to tie and fish the Borger pattern I would suggest using a straight shank hook.