-
my wife added a couple pics that she took for me a few posts back
so what do you all think? superfine?
Honestly, the handle shows no signs that it ever had a reef attached to it much less ever saw water
It is in perfect shape but the tube looks worn, My guess is that it was in a closet or somewhere that allowed things to wear on the tube and roll it around
-
Thanks for the clarification Dave.
Steve
-
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 4375The rod tube is correct, if not too well worn. Have the same rod tube & rod bag in an 8' - 4/1 All Rounder #7 weight with superfine action; from a few years earlier than the #1 weight & One Ounce debut.
-
My guess is that the rod never saw action but the tube rolled some guy's closet for the past couple decades. Not a mark where it counts!
thanks guys for all the help. I will be seeing my student in a few minutes and will break the news to him that the rod I thought was just a econo model is a bit better LOL
What reel would you (all) suggest to pair up with this?? if he were to keep it
-
Added a picture for y'all. Hope you can read the fine print on the left between the rod tube & the Orvis catalog. A CFO 1 was the matching reel, but a CFO II , a Hardy Flyweight or any other diminuative reel should balance adequately.